<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="31" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>But here is the strongest proof of all that in the agreement Pasion was not absolved from
          his debt, but on the contrary had agreed to repay the gold: when Menexenus lodged his suit
          against him, which was before the memorandum had been tampered with, Pasion sent
            Agyrrhius<note resp="editor">An influential man in public affairs; cf. <bibl n="Andoc. 1.133">Andoc. 1.133</bibl>.</note>, a friend of both of us, to beg that I
          either appease Menexenus or annul the agreement I had made with himself. </p></div><div n="32" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And yet, men of the jury, do you think that he would desire the annulment of this
          agreement, which he could use to convict us of falsehood? At any rate, this was not what
          he was saying after they had altered the memorandum; on the contrary, in all details he
          appealed to the agreement and ordered the memorandum to be opened. In proof that Pasion at
          first was eager for the suppression of the agreement I will produce Agyrrhius himself as
          witness. Please take the stand.</p><p rend="align(center)"><label>Testimony</label></p></div><div n="33" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> So then, the fact that we made the agreement, not as Pasion will try to explain, but as
          I have related to you, I think has been sufficiently established. And it should not
          occasion surprise, men of the jury, that he falsified the memorandum, not only for the
          reason that there have been numerous frauds of such nature, but because some of Pasion’s
          friends have been guilty of conduct far worse. For instance, is there anyone who is
          ignorant that Pythodorus, called “the shop-keeper,”<note resp="editor">Cf.
              <bibl n="Dem. 54.7">Dem. 54.7</bibl>.</note> whose words and acts are all in Pasion’s
          interest, last year opened the voting-urns<note resp="editor">These contained
            the names of those who had been nominated as possible judges of the dramatic contests of
            the festival of Dionysus.</note> and removed the ballots naming the judges which had
          been cast by the Council? </p></div><div n="34" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And yet when a man who, for petty gain and at the peril of his life, has the effrontery
          to open secretly the urns that had been stamped by the prytanes<note resp="editor">The Prytanes (Presidents), a committee of 50, one-tenth part of the Council of
            500, managed for one-tenth of the year the affairs of the Council and of the
            Assembly.</note> and sealed by the choregi,<note resp="editor">The Choregi
            were well-to-do Athenians, who were chosen to defray the costs of bringing out the
            choruses in the dramatic festivals.</note> urns that were guarded by the treasurers and
          kept on the Acropolis, why should there be surprise that men, who hoped to make so great a
          profit, falsified an insignificant written agreement in the possession of a foreigner,
          gaining their ends either by the bribery of his slaves or by some other means in their
          power? On this point, however, I do not know what more I need say. </p></div><div n="35" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Already Pasion has tried to persuade certain persons that I had no money at all here,
          asserting that I had borrowed three hundred staters<note resp="editor">The
            stater was a coin of a certain weight. The Persian gold stater, or daric, was worth a
            little more than a pound sterling. These were probably Cyzicene staters of Asia
            Minor.</note> from Stratocles. It is worth while, therefore, that you should hear me
          also on these matters, in order that you may understand how flimsy is the proof which
          encourages him to try to defraud me of my money. Now, men of the jury, when Stratocles was
          about to sail for Pontus, I, wishing to get as much of my money out of that country as
          possible, asked Stratocles to leave with me his own gold and on his arrival in Pontus to
          collect its equivalent from my father there, </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>