It has come to pass that our appeal is the opposite of that which other litigants
 generally make; for everybody else reminds the recipients of the benefactions they have
 received, whereas we ask you, the donors, to bear your gifts in mind, that they may serve
 you as corroboration of all I have said and of our principles of conduct. And it is evident that we showed ourselves worthy of this honor, not for the purpose of
 plundering the property of others after the oligarchy had been established, but in order
 that, after the city had been saved, not only all the citizens might keep their own
 possessions, but also that in the hearts of our fellow-citizens at large there might be a
 feeling of gratitude to us as a debt to be paid. It is this that we beg of you now, not
 seeking to have more than is just, but offering proof that we are guilty of no wrongdoing
 and asking you to abide by the oaths and the covenant of Amnesty. For it would be outrageous if those covenants should be held valid for the exculpation of
 the evil-doers, but should be made invalid for us, your benefactors! And it is prudent for
 you to guard well your present fortune, remembering that while in the past such agreements
 have increased civic discord in other cities, yet to ours they have brought a greater
 degree of concord. In §§ 67-68 the manuscripts offer a text
 both illegible in places and corrupt otherwise; see the critical notes. So you,
 keeping these considerations in mind, should cast your votes for that which is at the same
 time just and also expedient.