And yet do you think that a man who was well behaved under the Thirty put off his
 wrongdoing until that period when even those who had formerly transgressed were repentant?
 But the most absurd thing of all would be this—that although I never saw fit to avenge
 myself on anyone of my existing enemies, I was attempting to injure this man with whom I
 have never had any business dealings at all! That I am not responsible for the confiscation of the money of Callimachus I think I
 have sufficiently proved. But that it was not legally in his power to bring a suit
 pertaining to events which occurred then, not even if I had done everything he says I did,
 you will learn from the covenant of Amnesty. Cf. Isoc. 18.2 note 1. Please take the document. Amnesty Was it, then, a weak defense of my rights I trusted in when I entered this demurrer? On
 the contrary, do not the terms of the Amnesty explicitly exculpate any who have laid
 information against or denounced any person or have done any similar thing, and am I not
 able to prove that I have neither committed these acts nor transgressed in any other way?
 Please read the Oaths also. Oaths