I think, however, that even if there had been neither arbitration nor witnesses to the
 actual facts and you were under the necessity of considering the case in the light of the
 probabilities, not even in this event would you have difficulty in arriving at a just
 verdict. For if I were so audacious a man as to wrong others, you would with good reason
 condemn me as doing wrong to him also; but as it is, I shall be found innocent of having
 harmed any citizen in regard to his property, or of jeopardizing his life, or of having
 expunged his name from the list of active citizens, or of having inscribed his name on
 Lysander’s list. A list of citizens who were deprived of
 their civic rights; cf. Isoc. 21.2 and Xen. Hell. 2.3.17-19 . 
 And yet the wickedness of the Thirty For the crimes of the
 Thirty see the vivid account by Lysias in his speech Against
 Eratosthenes . impelled many to act in this way for they not only did not
 punish the evil-doers but they even commanded some persons to do wrong. So as for me, not
 even when they had control of the government, shall I be found guilty of any such misdeed;
 yet Callimachus says that he was wronged after the Thirty had been expelled, the Piraeus
 had been taken, and when the democracy was in power, and the terms of reconciliation were
 being discussed. And yet do you think that a man who was well behaved under the Thirty put off his
 wrongdoing until that period when even those who had formerly transgressed were repentant?
 But the most absurd thing of all would be this—that although I never saw fit to avenge
 myself on anyone of my existing enemies, I was attempting to injure this man with whom I
 have never had any business dealings at all! That I am not responsible for the confiscation of the money of Callimachus I think I
 have sufficiently proved. But that it was not legally in his power to bring a suit
 pertaining to events which occurred then, not even if I had done everything he says I did,
 you will learn from the covenant of Amnesty. Cf. Isoc. 18.2 note 1. Please take the document. Amnesty Was it, then, a weak defense of my rights I trusted in when I entered this demurrer? On
 the contrary, do not the terms of the Amnesty explicitly exculpate any who have laid
 information against or denounced any person or have done any similar thing, and am I not
 able to prove that I have neither committed these acts nor transgressed in any other way?
 Please read the Oaths also. Oaths