<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg097.perseus-eng3"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="intro"><pb xml:id="v.6.p.245"/><head><lb/>INTRODUCTION</head><p rend="indent">
					In this essay Plutarch has arranged his material somewhat more methodically than is his usual practice.
					In chaps. 1-7 he shows that Brotherly Love is in
					accordance with nature; in 9-19 he tells us how we
					should conduct ourselves toward a brother: (a) while
					our parents are alive, (b) when they are dead, (c) when
					the brother is our inferior, (d) when our superior;
					and also the reasons for quarrels and the treatment
					thereof. He closes with some pleasant tales of
					affection for brothers’ children.
				</p><p rend="indent">
					That Plutarch wrote this work after <title rend="italic">De Adulatore
						et Amico</title>, <title rend="italic">De Amicorum Multitudine</title>,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">This point was subsequently shown, but with much less care and detail, by G. Hein (<title rend="italic">Quaestiones Plut.</title>, diss. Berlin, 1916, p. 37), who seems to have been ignorant of Brokate’s far superior work.</note> and the <title rend="italic">Life of
							Cato Minor</title> was demonstrated by C. Brokate (<title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">De
								aliquot Plui. libellis</title>, diss. Güttingen, 1913, pp. 17-24,
					58; and see the excellent tables on pp. 47, 61).
					Plutarch appears to have retained a certain amount
					of more or less irrelevant material on friendship from
					his recent work on these treatises, and also to have
					drawn upon some portions of Theophrastus’s treatise
            	<title rend="italic">On Friendship</title>.<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Brokate, <foreign xml:lang="lat">op. cit.</foreign>, pp. 7 ff.</note>
				        </p><p rend="indent">
					The essay is No. 98 in the Lamprias catalogue.
					
				</p></div><pb xml:id="v.6.p.247"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="1"><p rend="indent">The ancient representations of the Dioscuri are
					called by the Spartans <q>beam-figures</q>
               <note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> M. C. Waites, <title rend="italic">Amer. Jour. Arch.</title>, xxiii., 1919, pp. 1 ff.: this passage is cited by Eustathius on <title rend="italic">Il.</title>, 1125. 60.</note>: they
					consist of two parallel wooden beams joined by two
					other transverse beams placed across them; and
					this common and indivisible character of the offering
					appears entirely suitable to the brotherly love of
					these gods. In like manner do I also dedicate this
					treatise <title rend="italic">On Brotherly Love</title> to you, Nigrinus and
            	Quietus,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">The identity of Avidius Nigrinus and Avidius Quietus is not certainly established; see <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Prosopographia Imp. Rom.</title>, i. pp. 189-190.</note> a joint gift for you both who well deserve
					it. For as to the exhortations this essay contains,
					since you are already putting them into practice, you
					will seem to be giving your testimony in their favour
					rather than to be encouraged to perform them; and
					the pleasure you will take in acts which are right will
					make the perseverance of your judgement more firm,
					inasmuch as your acts will win approval before spectators, so to speak, who are honourable and devoted
					to virtue.
				</p><p rend="indent">
					Now Aristarchus,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Nauck, comparing Suidas, <foreign xml:lang="lat">s.v.</foreign> Theodectes, and Stephanus Byzantius, would correct <q>Aristarchus</q> to Aristandrus, the father of the tragic poet Theodectas of Phaselis.</note> the father of Theodectes, by way
					of jeering at the crowd of sophists, used to say that in
					the old days there were barely seven Sophists,
            	<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">That is, the Seven Wise Men. Plutarch so uses <foreign xml:lang="grc">σοφιστής</foreign> (<title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">cf. Moralia</title>, 96 a, where all mss. but one read <foreign xml:lang="grc">σοφιστοῦ</foreign>; 857 f); so also Aristotle, Frag. 5 ed. V. Rose. <foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> the earlier usage of Herodotus, i. 29 (where Wells’s note is hopelessly wrong); ii. 49; iv. 95; Hippocrates, <title rend="italic">De Vet. Med.</title>, 20.</note> but
					
					<pb xml:id="v.6.p.249"/>
					
					that in his own day an equally large number of
					non-sophists could not easily be found. And according to my observation, brotherly love is as rare in
					our day as brotherly hatred was among the men of
					old; when instances of such hatred appeared, they
					were so amazing that the times made them known to
					all as warning examples in tragedies and other
					stage-performances; but all men of to-day, when they
					encounter brothers who are good to each other,
					wonder at them no less than at those famous sons of
					Molione,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Cf. Moralia</title>, 1083 c; Fraser’s note on Apollodorus, ii. 7. 2 (L.C.L. vol. i. p. 249).</note> who, according to common belief, were
					born with their bodies grown together; and to use
					in common a fathers wealth and friends and
					slaves is considered as incredible and portentous as
					for one soul to make use of the hands and feet and
					eyes of two bodies.
				</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>