<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg097.perseus-eng3"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="16"><p rend="indent">But, over and above these considerations, we
					should be on our guard against the pernicious talk of
					relatives, of members of our household, and sometimes even of a wife who joins the rest in challenging
					our ambition by saying: <q>Your brother carries all
						before him and is admired and courted, but you are
						not visited by anybody and enjoy no distinction at
						all.</q> 
               <q>Not so,</q> a sensible man would reply. <q>I have
							a brother who is highly esteemed, and most of his
							influence is mine to share.</q> Socrates, for instance,
					remarked that he would rather have Darius than
					a daric as a friend, and for a brother who has good
					sense it is no less an advantage than the possession of
					wealth, high office, or eloquence, to have a brother
					who has attained to fame by virtue of office or
					wealth or eloquence.
				</p><p rend="indent">
					But although these means are the best for smoothing away such inequalities, yet there are the other
					differences which naturally arise among brothers who
					lack the proper training, differences due to disparity
					in their ages. For, generally speaking, elder brothers,
					when they claim the right always to dominate and
					to have precedence over the younger and to have the
					advantage in every matter where reputation and influence are involved, are oppressive and disagreeable;
					and younger brothers, in turn, being restive under the
					curb and becoming fractious, make it their practice
					to despise and belittle the elder. The result is that
					while the younger, feeling that they are being treated
					despitefully and are discriminated against, resent and
					try to avoid their elders’ admonitions, the elder, ever
					clinging fast to their superiority, fear their brothers’
					
					
					<pb xml:id="v.6.p.297"/>
					
					augmentation as though it meant elimination for
					themselves. Just as, then, we think it right that
					those who receive a favour should look upon it as of
					greater, and those who bestow it as of lesser value,
					so, in regard to a difference in ages, if we advise the
					elder to regard it as no great matter and the younger
					to think it no slight thing, we should rid the one
					of arrogance and neglect, and the other of disdain
					and contempt. And since it is fitting that the older
					should be solicitous about the younger and should
					lead and admonish him, and that the younger should
					honour and emulate and follow the older, let the
					solicitude of the former be rather that of a comrade than of a father, and of one who would persuade rather than command, and would rejoice in
					a brother’s successes and applaud them rather than
					criticize him if he errs and restrain him-a spirit
					showing not only a greater desire to help, but also
					more kindness of heart. And in the emulation of
					the younger let imitation, not rivalry, be present;
					for imitation is the act of one who admires, but
					rivalry of one who envies. It is for this reason that
					men love those who wish to become like themselves,
					but repress and crush those who wish to become their
					equals. And among the many honours which it is
					fitting that the young render to their elders, obedience
					is most highly esteemed, and, together with respectfulness, brings about a staunch goodwill and favour
					which will in turn lead to concessions. Thus it was
					with Cato<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><title rend="italic">Cf. Life of Cato Minor</title>, iii. (761 b-c). Q. Servillus Caepio was Cato’s half-brother.</note>: he so won over his elder brother Caepio by
					obedience and gentleness and silence from his earliest
					childhood that finally, by the time they both were
					men, he had so subdued him and filled him with so
					great a respect for himself that Caepio would neither
					
					
					<pb xml:id="v.6.p.299"/>
					
					do nor say anything without Cato’s knowledge. For
					example, it is said that on one occasion, when Caepio
					had affixed his seal to a deposition and Cato carne up
					later and was unwilling to add his own seal, Caepio
					demanded that the document be returned and removed his seal before asking the reason why his
					brother had suspected the deposition instead of
					believing it to be true. In the case of Epicurus<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Cf. Moralia</title>, 1100 a; Epicurus, Frag. 178 (Usener, <title rend="italic">Epicurea</title>, p. 155).</note> also
					his brothers’ respect for him was clearly great because
					of the goodwill and solicitude he had for them,
					inspired as they were with admiration both for his
					other attainments and especially for his philosophy.
					For even if they were mistaken in their opinion, yet
					since they were convinced and constantly declared
					from their earliest childhood that there was no one
					wiser than Epicurus, we may well admire both the
					man who inspired this devotion and also those who
					felt it. However, of the more recent philosophers,
					Apollonius the Peripatetic, by making Sotion, his
					younger brother, more famous than himself, refuted
					the man who asserted that fame could not be
					shared with another. And for myself, though I have
					received from Fortune many favours which call for
					gratitude, that my brother Timon’s<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Timon appears in the <title rend="italic">Quaest. Symp.</title>, i. 2 and ii. 5.</note> affection for me
					has always transcended and still transcends all the
					rest, no one is unaware who has ever had any dealings
					whatever with me, and least of all you,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Nigrinus and Quietus; <foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> 478 b, <foreign xml:lang="lat">supra</foreign>.</note> my familiar
					friends.
				</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="17"><p rend="indent">Furthermore, there are other disturbances
					which brothers of nearly the same age must guard
					against; they are but small, to be sure, yet continuous and frequent, and create a vicious practice of
					offending and exasperating one another on all occasions,
					
					<pb xml:id="v.6.p.301"/>
					
					which at last ends in incurable hatred and
					malevolence. For having once begun to differ in
					childish matters, about the care of animals and their
					fights, as, for instance, those of quails or cocks, they
					then continue to differ about the contests of boys in
					the palaestra, of dogs on the hunt, and of horses at
					the races, until they are no longer able to control or
					subdue their contentious and ambitious spirit in more
					important matters. So the most powerful of the
					Greeks in my time, disagreeing first about rival
					dancers, then about harp-players, and afterwards by
					continually holding up to invidious comparison the
					swimming-baths and porticoes and banquet-halls at
					Aedepsus,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Medicinal hot baths in Euboea; <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Cf. Moralia</title>, 667 c-d.</note> and then manoeuvring for places and positions, and going on to cut off aqueducts and divert
					their waters, they became so savage and reckless that
					they were deprived of everything by the despot,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Probably Domitian, as Reiske conjectured.</note>
					and, becoming exiles and paupers and-I had almost
					said-something other than their former selves, they
					remained the same only in their hatred for one
					another. It is therefore of no slight importance to
					resist the spirit of contentiousness and jealousy
					among brothers when it first creeps in over trivial
					matters, practising the art of making mutual concessions, of learning to take defeat, and of taking
					pleasure in indulging brothers rather than in winning
					victories over them. For the men of old gave the
					name of <q>Cadmean<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Cf. Moralia</title>, 10 a, and the note; the expedition of the Seven against Thebes, in which the two sons of Oedipus, Eteocles and Polyneices, died fighting against each other in single combat.</note> victory</q> to no other than that
					of the brothers at Thebes, as being the most
					shameful and the worst of victories.
				</p><p rend="indent">
					What then? Do not practical affairs bring many
					
					<pb xml:id="v.6.p.303"/>
					
					occasions for controversy and dissension even to those
					who have the reputation of being of an equitable and
					gentle disposition? Yes, certainly. But there also
					we must see to it that the affairs fight the battle
					quite by themselves, without our inserting into
					the contest, like a hook, as it were, any emotion
					arising from contentiousness or anger; but, keeping
					our eyes fixed impartially upon the swaying of
					Justice, as though we were watching a pair of
					balances, we should with all speed turn over the
					matter in dispute to the decision of a jury or of
					arbitrators, and cleanse its filth away before, like a
					dye or stain, it sinks into the fabric and its colours
					become fast and hard to wash out. We should
					next pattern ourselves after the Pythagoreans, who,
					though related not at all by birth, yet sharing a
					common discipline,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">No doubt the <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀκροάματα</foreign> of the Master: see Iamblichus, <title rend="italic">Vita Pythagorica</title>, 82 ff. (Notopoulos).</note> if ever they were led by anger
					into recrimination, never let the sun go down<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><title rend="italic">Cf. Ephesians</title>, iv. 26-27: Let not the sun go down upon your wrath; neither give place to the devil.</note>
					before they joined right hands, embraced each
					other, and were reconciled. For just as it is nothing
					alarming if a fever attends a swelling in the groin,
					but if the fever persists when the swelling is gone,
					it is thought to be a malady and to have a deeper
					origin: so when the dissension of brothers ceases
					after the matter in dispute is settled, the dissension
					was caused by the matter; but if it remains, the
					matter was but a pretext and contained some
					malignant and festering reason.
				</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>