<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:id="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg084a.perseus-eng4" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="78"><p rend="indent"><label><emph>Question</emph> 78.</label> What is the reason that a bird called <emph>sinister</emph> in soothsaying is fortunate?</p><p rend="indent"><emph>Solution.</emph> What if this be not true, but the dialect deludes so many? For they render <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀριστέρον</foreign> <foreign xml:lang="lat">sinistrum</foreign>; but to permit a thing is <foreign xml:lang="lat">sinere</foreign>, and they say <foreign xml:lang="lat">sine</foreign> when they desire a thing to be permitted; therefore a prognostic permitting an action (being <foreign xml:lang="lat">sinisterium</foreign>) the vulgar do understand and call amiss <foreign xml:lang="lat">sinistrum</foreign>. Or is it as Dionysius saith, that when Ascanius, the son of Aeneas, had pitched battle against Mezentius, a flash of lightning portending victory (as they prognosticated) came on his left hand, and for the future they observed it so; or, as some others say, that this happened to Aeneas? Moreover, the Thebans routing and conquering their enemies by the left wing of the army at Leuctra, they continued in all battles to give the left wing the pre-eminence. Or is it rather as Juba thinks, that to those that look toward the east the north is on the left hand, which verily some make the right hand and superior part of the world? Consider whether the soothsayers do not, as it were, corroborate left-hand things, as the weaker <pb xml:id="v.2.p.246"/> by nature, and do intimate as if they introduced a supply of that defect of power that is in them. Or is it that they think that things terrestrial and mortal stand directly over against heavenly and divine things, and do conjecture that the things which to us are on the left hand the Gods send down from their right hand?</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="79"><p rend="indent"><label><emph>Question</emph> 79.</label> Why was it lawful to bring the bones of one that had triumphed (after he was dead and burnt) into the city and lay them there, as Pyrrho the Liparaean hath told us?</p><p rend="indent"><emph>Solution.</emph> Was it for the honor they had for the deceased? For they granted that not only generals and other eminent persons, but also their offspring, should be buried in the market-place, for example, Valerius and Fabricius. And they say, when the posterity of these persons died, they were brought into the market-place, and a burning firebrand was put under them and immediately taken away; and thus all that might have caused envy was avoided, and the right to the honor was fully confirmed.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="80"><p rend="indent"><label><emph>Question</emph> 80.</label> Why did they that publicly feasted the triumphers humbly request the consuls, and by messengers sent beseech them, not to come to their supper?</p><p rend="indent"><emph>Solution.</emph> Was it that it was necessary to give the supreme place and most honorable entertainment to the triumpher, and wait upon him home after supper; whereas, the consuls being present, they might do such things to none other but them?</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>