Why on the festival of the Veneralia do they pour out a great quantity of wine from the temple of Venus? Cf. Ovid, Fasti , iv. 877 ff.: Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities , i. 65; Pliny, Natural History , xiv. 12 (88), where the authority cited is Varro. Plutarch speaks of the festival of Vinalia (April 23) as Veneralia perhaps because Venus (together with Jupiter) was the protecting deity of the vine. Is it true, as most authorities affirm, that Mezentius, general of the Etruscans, sent to Aeneas and offered peace on condition of his receiving the year’s vintage? But when Aeneas refused, Mezentius promised his Etruscans that when he had prevailed in battle, he would give them the wine. Aeneas learned of his promise and consecrated the wine to the gods, and after his victory he collected all the vintage and poured it out in front of the temple of Venus. Or is this also symbolic, indicating that men should be sober and not drunken on festival days, since the gods take more pleasure in those who spill much strong drink than in those who imbibe it? Why did the men of old keep the temple of Horta continually open? Is it, as Antistius Labeo has stated, that since to urge on is expressed by hortari , Horta is the goddess who urges us on, as it were, and incites us to noble actions: and thus they thought that, since she was ever active, she should never be procrastinating nor shut off by herself nor unemployed? Or rather do they call her, as at present, Hora, with the first syllable lengthened, an attentive and very considerate goddess, who, since she was protective and thoughtful, they felt was never indifferent nor neglectful of human affairs? Or is this too, like many other Latin words, a Greek word, and does it signify the supervising and guardian goddess? Hence her temple was continually open since she neither slumbers nor sleeps. If, however, Labeo be right in pointing out that Hora is derived from parorman Plutarch here (in hora, horman, (h)orator ), as often, makes havoc of etymology and quantity. (to urge on), consider whether we must not declare that orator is thus to be derived, since an orator is a counsellor or popular leader who stimulates, as it were, and incites: and it is not to be derived from imprecating or praying ( orare ), as some assert. Why did Romulus build the temple of Vulcan outside the city? Was it in consequence of Vulcan’s fabled jealousy of Mars because of Venus Cf. Homer, Od. viii. 266-359. that Romulus, the reputed son of Mars, did not give Vulcan a share in his home or his city? Or is this a foolish explanation, and was the temple originally built as a secret place of assembly and council-chamber for himself and his colleague Tatius, that here they might convene with the senators and take counsel concerning public affairs in quiet without being disturbed? Or was it that since Rome, from the very beginning, has been in great danger from conflagrations, they decided to show honour to this god, but to place his temple outside of the city? Cf. Vitruvius, i. 7. 1. Why is it that at the festival of the Consualia they place garlands on both the horses and the asses and allow them to rest? Is it because they celebrate this festival in honour of Poseidon, god of horses, Cf. Life of Romulus , chap. xiv. (25 d). and the ass enjoys a share in the horse’s exemption? Or is it that since navigation and transport by sea have been discovered, pack animals have come to enjoy a certain measure of ease and rest? Why was it the custom for those canvassing for office to do so in the toga without the tunic, as Cato has recorded? Cf. Life of Coriolanus , chap. xiv. (219 f-220 a). Was it in order that they might not carry money in the folds of their tunic and give bribes? Or was it rather because they used to judge candidates worthy of office, not by their family nor their wealth nor their repute, but by their wounds and scars? Accordingly that these might be visible to those that encountered them, they used to go down to their canvassing without tunics. Or were they trying to commend themselves to popular favour by thus humiliating themselves by their scanty attire, even as they do by hand-shaking, personal appeals, and fawning behaviour?