Why do they reckon the day that follows the Kalends, the Nones, or the Ides as unsuitable for leaving home or for travel? Is it, as most authorities think and as Livy Livy, v. 37; and vi. 1. 11. records, that on the day after the Ides of Quintilis, which they now call July, the military tribunes led out the army, and were vanquished in battle by the Gauls at the river Allia and lost the City? But when the day after the Ides had come to be regarded as ill-omened, did superstition, as is its wont, extend the custom further, and involve in the same circumspection the day after the Nones and the day after the Kalends? Or does this contain many irrational assumptions? For it was on a different day that they were defeated in battle, The traditional date of the battle was July 18, 390 b.c. a day which they call Alliensis from the river, and make a dread day of expiation Cf. Life of Camillus , chap. xix. 8 (138 d). ; and although they have many ill-omened days, they do not observe them under the same names As the Kalends, the Nones, and the Ides have the same names in every month. in each month, but each in the month in which it occurs: and it is thus quite incredible that the superstition should have attached itself simply to all the days that follow immediately after the Nones or the Kalends. Consider the following analogy: just as they have dedicated the first month to the gods of Olympus, and the second, in which they perform certain rites of purification and sacrifice to the departed, to the gods of the lower world, so also in regard to the days of the month they have established three as festive and holy days, as I have stated, 269 b, supra . which are, as it were, fundamental and sovereign days: but the days which follow immediately they have dedicated to the spirits and the dead, and have come to regard them as ill-omened and unsuitable for business. In fact, the Greeks worship the gods on the day of the new moon: the next day they have duly assigned to the heroes and spirits, and the second bowl of wine is mixed in honour of the heroes and heroines, That is, the spirits of the men and women of the Heroic Age who dwelt after death in the Isles of the Blest or in Hades. And speaking generally, time is a sort of number: and the beginning of number is divine, for it is the monad. But after it is the dyad, antagonistic to the beginning number, and the first of the even numbers. The even numbers are imperfect, incomplete, and indeterminate, just as the odd numbers are determinate, completing, and perfect. Cf. 264 a, supra , also Moralia , 374 a, 387 f, 429 a, 1002 a, 1012 e. Wherefore, in like manner, the Nones succeed the Kalends at an interval of five days and the Ides succeed the Nones at an interval of nine days. For the odd numbers define the beginnings, but the even numbers, since they occur after the beginnings, have no position nor power; therefore on these days they do not begin any business or travel. Or has also the saying of Themistocles Cf. 320 f, infra ; Life of Themistocles , xviii. (121 b). The context of 345 c, infra , makes it very probably that the essay De Gloria Atheniensium began with this favourite story of Plutarch’s. some foundation in reason? For once upon a time, said he, the Day-After had an altercation with the Feast-Day on the ground that the Feast-Day had much labour and toil, whereas she herself provided the opportunity of enjoying in leisure and quiet all the things prepared for the festival. To this the Feast-Day replied, You are quite right; but if I had not been, you would not be! This story Themistocles related to the Athenian generals who succeeded him, to show that they would have been nowhere, if he himself had not saved the city. Since, therefore, all travel and all business of importance needs provision and preparation, and since in ancient days the Romans, at the time of festivals, made no provision or plan for anything, save only that they were engaged in the service of their gods and busied themselves with this only, just as even to this day the priests cause such a proclamation to be made in advance as they proceed on their way to sacrifice: so it was only natural that they did not set out on a journey immediately after their festivals, nor did they transact any business, for they were unprepared; but that day they always spent at home making their plans and preparations. Or is it even as men now, who have offered their prayers and oblations, are wont to tarry and sit a while in the temples, Cf. Life of Numa , xiv. (69 e-70 a); Propertius ii. 28. 45-46; see also Lewy in Philologus , lxxxiv. p. 378. and so they would not let busy days succeed holy days immediately, but made some pause and breathing-space between, since business brings with it much that is distasteful and undesired? Why do women in mourning wear white robes and white head-dresses? Do they do this, as men say the Magi do, arraying themselves against Hades and the powers of darkness, and making themselves like unto Light and Brightness? Or is it that, just as they clothe the body of the dead in white, they think it proper that the relatives should also wear this colour? They adorn the body thus since they cannot so adorn the soul; and they wish to send forth the soul bright and pure, since it is now set free after having fought the good fight in all its manifold forms. Or are plainness and simplicity most becoming on these occasions? Of the dyed garments, some reflect expense, others over-elaboration: for we may say no less with reference to black than to purple: These be cheating garments, these be cheating colours. Apparently a misquotation of Herodotus, iii. 22. 1: otherwise misquoted in Moralia , 646 b and 863 e. Cf. also Clement of Alexandria, Stromateis , i. x. 48. 6 (p. 344 Potter). That which is naturally black is dyed not through art, but by nature: and when it is combined with a dark colour, it is overpowered. This apparently means: Naturally black wool may be dyed purple or any other strong dark colour. It is possible, however, that Plutarch wrote κέκραται (and so several mss.): it is modified when combined with a dark colour. Only white, Cf. Plato, Republic , 729 d-e. therefore, is pure, unmixed, and uncontaminated by dye, nor can it be imitated: wherefore it is most appropriate for the dead at burial. For he who is dead has become something simple, unmixed, and pure, once he has been released from the body, which is indeed to be compared with a stain made by dyeing. In Argos, as Socrates Müller, Frag. Hist. Graec. iv. 498. says, persons in mourning wear white garments washed in water. Why do they regard all the city wall as inviolable and sacred, but not the gates? Is it, as Varro has written, because the wall must be considered sacred that men may fight and die with enthusiasm in its defence? It was under such circumstances, it seems, that Romulus killed his brother because he was attempting to leap across a place that was inviolable and sacred, and to make it traversable and profane. But it was impossible to consecrate the gates, for through them they carry out many other objectionable things and also dead bodies. Cf. Moralia , 518 b. Wherefore the original founders of a city yoke a bull and a cow, and mark out with a plough all the land on which they intend to build Cf. Varro, De Lingua Latina , v. 143, Res Rusticae , ii. 1. 9; Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities , i. 88; Ovid, Fasti , iv. 819 ff. ; and when they are engaged in tracing Cf. Life of Romulus , xi. (23 d). the circuit of the walls, as they measure off the space intended for gates, they lift up the ploughshare and thus carry the plough across, since they hold that all the land that is ploughed is to be kept sacred and inviolable. Why do they tell children, whenever they would swear by Hercules, not to do so under a roof, and bid them go out into the open air? Cf. Varro, De Lingua Latina , v. 66. Is it, as some relate, because they believe that Hercules had no pleasure in staying in the house, but rejoiced in a life in the open air and a bed under the stars? Or is it rather because Hercules is not one of the native gods, but a foreigner from afar? For neither do they swear under a roof by Bacchus, since he also is a foreign god if he is from Nysa. Or is this but said in jest to the children, and what is done is really a check upon over-readiness and hastiness to swear, as Favorinus stated? For what is done following, as it were, upon preparation produces delay and allows deliberation. Yet one might urge against Favorinus the fact that this custom is not common, but peculiar to Hercules, as may be seen from the legend about him: for it is recorded that he was so circumspect regarding an oath that he swore but once and for Phyleus, the son of Augeas, alone. Wherefore they say that the prophetic priestess also brought up against the Spartans all the oaths they had sworn, saying that it would be better and much more to be desired if they would keep them! Cf. Moralia , 229 b and the note (Vol. III. p. 372). Why do they not allow the bride to cross the threshold of her home herself, but those who are escorting her lift her over? Cf. Life of Romulus , xv. (26 d-e). Is it because they carried off by force also the first Roman brides and bore them in in this manner, and the women did not enter of their own accord? Or do they wish it to appear that it is under constraint and not of their own desire that they enter a dwelling where they are about to lose their virginity? Or is it a token that the woman may not go forth of her own accord and abandon her home if she be not constrained, just as it was under constraint that she entered it? So likewise among us in Boeotia they burn the axle of the bridal carriage before the door, signifying that the bride must remain, since her means of departure has been destroyed.