<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:id="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg084a.perseus-eng3" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="106"><p rend="indent">Why do the Romans reverence Fortuna Primigenia,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> 281 e, <foreign xml:lang="lat">supra</foreign>, 322 f, <foreign xml:lang="lat">infra</foreign>; Cicero, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">De Legibus</title>, ii. 11; Livy, xxxiv. 53.</note> or <q>First-born,</q> as one might translate it? </p><p rend="indent">Is it because by Fortune, as they say, it befell Servius, born of a maidservant, to become a famous king of Rome? This is the assumption which the majority of Romans make. </p><p rend="indent">Or is it rather because Fortune supplied the origin and birth of Rome?<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> 320 b ff., <foreign xml:lang="lat">infra</foreign>.</note> </p><p rend="indent">Or does the matter have an explanation more natural and philosophic, which assumes that Fortune is the origin of everything, and Nature acquires its solid frame by the operation of Fortune, whenever order is created in any store of matter gathered together at haphazard. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="107"><p rend="indent">Why do the Romans call the Dionysiac artists<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Moralia</title>, 87 f.</note> <foreign xml:lang="lat">histriones</foreign> <note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Livy, vii. 2; closely followed by Valerius Maximus, ii. 4. 4.</note>? </p><p rend="indent">Is it for the reason that Cluvius Rufus<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">Peter, <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Frag. Hist. Rom.</title> p. 314, Cluvius, Frag. 4.</note> has recorded? For he states that in very ancient times, in the consulship of Gaius Sulpicius and Licinius Stolo,<note resp="editor" place="unspecified" anchored="true">In 361 b.c.</note> a pestilential disease arose in Rome and destroyed to a man all persons appearing on the stage. Accordingly, at the request of the Romans, there came many excellent artists from Etruria, of whom the first in repute and the one who for the longest time enjoyed success in their theatres, was named Hister: and therefore ali actors are named <foreign xml:lang="lat">histriones</foreign> from him. <pb xml:id="v.4.p.161"/> </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>