<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg077.perseus-eng3"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="5"><p rend="indent"><said who="#Zeuxippus" rend="merge"><label>ZEUXIPPUS.</label> If, however, such imperative occasions suddenly confront us when we are overloaded and in no condition for taking part — if, for instance, we receive an invitation from a high official, or guests appear, so <pb xml:id="v.2.p.227"/> that we are constrained by a false sense of shame to join company with men who are in fit condition and to drink with them — then especially, in order to combat <q>shame which works mischief for men</q> <note place="unspecified" anchored="true">The reference may be to Homer, <title rend="italic">Il.</title> xxiv. 45 (<foreign xml:lang="lat">cf.</foreign> Hesiod, <title rend="italic">Works and Days,</title> 318).</note> (or rather I would call it shamefacedness), we should summon to our defence the words which Creon speaks <note place="unspecified" anchored="true">Euripides, <title rend="italic">Medea</title>, 290, quoted also in <title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Moralia</title>, 530 C.</note> in the tragedy: <quote rend="blockquote">’Twere better, friend, to gain your hatred now Than be soft-hearted and lament anon.</quote> For to be so afraid of being thought ill-bred as to plunge oneself into a pleurisy or brain-fever is proof that one is in very truth ill-bred, possessed of neither sense nor the reason which knows how to consort with men without the wine-glass and the savour of food.<note place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign><title rend="italic" xml:lang="lat">Moralia</title>, 612 F.</note> For a request to be excused, if characterized by cleverness and wit, is no less agreeable than joining in the round of gaiety; and if a man provides a banquet in the same spirit in which he provides a burnt-offering which it is forbidden to taste, and personally abstains when the wine-cup and the table are before him, at the same time volunteering cheerfully some playful allusion to himself, he will create a pleasanter impression than the man who gets drunk and gormandizes for company. Of the men of earlier times he <note place="unspecified" anchored="true">Presumable Plutarch again.</note> mentioned Alexander,<note place="unspecified" anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Cf.</foreign> Plutarch’s <title rend="italic">Life of Alexander</title>, chap. lxxv. (p. 706 C); Diodorus, xvii. 117; Athenaeus, 434 C; Arrian, <title rend="italic">Anabasis</title>, vii. 25. 1; Quintus Curtius, x. 4; Justin, xii. 13.</note> who, after a prolonged debauch, was ashamed to say no to the challenges of Medius, and abandoned himself to a fresh round of hard drinking, which cost him his life; and of the men of our time he mentioned Regulus the prize-fighter. For when Titus Caesar called him to the bath at daybreak, <pb xml:id="v.2.p.229"/> he came and bathed with him, took but one drink, they say, and died immediately from a stroke of apoplexy. </said></p><p rend="indent"><said who="#Zeuxippus" rend="merge"><label>ZEUXIPPUS.</label> These are the teachings which Glaucus in derision quoted aggressively to us as pedantic. The rest he was not eager to hear, nor we to tell him. But I beg that you will examine each of the several statements. </said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>