<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="edition" n="urn:cts:engLit:sidney.defence.perseus-eng1" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" xml:base="urn:cts:engLit:sidney.defence.perseus-eng1" n="14"><p resp="perseus">Of this haue bene three generall kindes, the chiefe both in antiquitie and excellencie, were they that did imitate the vnconceiueable excellencies of God. Such were <name rend="italic">Dauid</name> in his Psalmes, <name rend="italic">Salomon</name> in his song of songs, in his <name rend="italic">Ecclesiastes</name> and <name rend="italic">Prouerbes. Moses</name> and <name rend="italic">Debora</name>, in their Hymnes, and the wryter of <name rend="italic">Iobe: </name> Which beside other, the learned <name rend="italic">Emanuell, </name> <name rend="italic">Tremelius</name>, and <name rend="italic">F. Iunius</name>, doo entitle the Poeticall part of the scripture: against these none will speake that hath the holie Ghost in due holie reuerence. In this kinde, though in a full wrong diuinitie, were <name rend="italic">Orpheus</name>, <name rend="italic"> Amphion</name>, <name rend="italic"> Homer</name> in his himnes, and manie other both <name rend="italic">Greeke</name> and <name rend="italic">Romanes</name>. And this <name rend="italic">Poesie</name> must be vsed by whosoeuer will follow <name rend="italic">S. Paules</name> counsaile, in singing Psalmes when they are mery, and I knowe is vsed with the frute of comfort by some, when in sorrowfull panges of their death bringing sinnes, they finde the consolation of the neuer leauing goodnes. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" xml:base="urn:cts:engLit:sidney.defence.perseus-eng1" n="15"><p resp="perseus">The second kinde, is of them that deale with matters Philosophicall, either morall as <name rend="italic">Tirteus</name>, <name rend="italic">Phocilides</name>, <name rend="italic">Cato</name>; or naturall, as <name rend="italic">Lucretius, </name> and <name rend="italic">Virgils Georgikes</name>; or Astronomicall as <name rend="italic">Manilius</name> and <name rend="italic">Pontanus</name>; or Historicall as <name rend="italic">Lucan: </name> which who mislike the fault, is in their iudgement quite out of tast, &amp; not in the sweet food of sweetly vttered knowledge. But bicause this second sort is wrapped within the folde of the proposed subiect, and takes not the free course of his own inuention, whether they properly bee Poets or no, let <name rend="italic">Gramarians</name> dispute; and goe to the third indeed right Poets, of whom chiefly this question ariseth: betwixt whom and these second, is such a kinde of difference, as betwixt the meaner sort of Painters, who counterfeyt onely such faces as are set before them, and the more excelent, who hauing no law but wit, bestow that in colours vpon you, which is fittest for the eye to see, and the constant, though lamenting looke of <name rend="italic">Lucretia</name>, when shee punished in her selfe anothers faulte: wherein hee painteth not <name rend="italic">Lucretia</name> whom he neuer saw, but painteth the outward bewty of such a vertue. For these third be they which most properly do imitate to teach &amp; delight: and to imitate, borrow nothing of what is, hath bin, or shall be, but range onely reined with learned discretion, into the diuine consideration of what may be and should be. These be they that as the first and most noble sort, may iustly be termed <foreign xml:lang="lat">Vates: </foreign> so these are waited on in the excellentest languages and best vnderstandings, with the fore described name of Poets. For these indeed do meerly make to imitate, and imitate both to delight &amp; teach, and delight to moue men to take that goodnesse in hand, which without delight they would flie as from a stranger; and teach to make them know that goodnesse wherunto they are moued: which being the noblest scope to which euer any learning was directed, yet want there not idle tongues to barke at them. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" xml:base="urn:cts:engLit:sidney.defence.perseus-eng1" n="16"><p resp="perseus">These be subdiuided into sundry more speciall denominations. The most notable be the <name rend="italic">Heroick</name>, <name rend="italic"> Lyrick</name>, <name rend="italic"> Tragick</name>, <name rend="italic"> Comick</name>, <name rend="italic"> Satyrick</name>, <name rend="italic"> Iambick</name>, <name rend="italic"> Elegiack</name>, <name rend="italic"> Pastorall</name>, and certaine others: some of these being tearmed according to the matter they deale with, some by the sort of verse they liked best to write in, for indeed the greatest part of Poets, haue apparelled their poeticall inuentions, in that numbrous kind of writing which is called <name rend="italic">vers. </name> Indeed but apparelled verse: being but an ornament and no cause to <name rend="italic">Poetrie</name>, since there haue bene many most excellent <name rend="italic">Poets</name> that neuer versefied, and now swarme many versefiers that need neuer answere to the name of <name rend="italic">Poets</name>. For <name rend="italic">Xenophon</name> who did imitate so excellently as to giue vs <foreign xml:lang="lat">effigiem iusti imperii</foreign>, the pourtraiture of a iust Empyre vnder the name of <name rend="italic">Cyrus</name>, as <name rend="italic">Cicero</name> saith of him, made therein an absolute heroicall Poeme. So did <name rend="italic">Heliodorus</name>, in his sugred inuention of that picture of loue in <name rend="italic">Theagenes</name> &amp; <name rend="italic">Chariclea</name>, and yet both these wrote in prose, which I speake to shew, that it is not ryming and versing that maketh a Poet, (no more then a long gown maketh an Aduocate, who though he pleaded in Armour, should be an Aduocat and no souldier) but it is that faining notable images of vertues, vices, or what els, with that delightfull teaching, which must be the right describing note to know a Poet by. Although indeed the Senate of Poets hath chosen verse as their fittest raiment: meaning as in matter, they passed all in all, so in maner, to go beyond them: not speaking table talke fashion, or like men in a dreame, words as they chanceably fall from the mouth, but peasing each sillable of eache word by iust proportion, according to the dignitie of the subiect. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>