<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="edition" n="urn:cts:engLit:james1.defence.perseus-eng1" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="3"><head> THE SECOND INCONVENIENCE EXAMINED.</head><p>THE second Inconuenience like to grow, (as the Lord Cardinall seemeth to be halfe afraid)
       <note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag. 86.</note> if the Article of the third Estate might
      haue passed with approba- tion, is couched in these words: <hi rend="italic">Lay-men shall by
       authoritie bee strengthened with power, to iudge in matters of Religion; as also to determine
       the doctrine comprised in the said Article to haue requisite conformitie with Gods word: yea
       they shall haue it in their hands to compell Ecclesiastics by necessitie, to sweare, preach,
       and teach the opinion of the one side, as also by Sermons and publike writings to impugne the
       other</hi>. This inconuenience he aggrauateth with swelling words, and breaketh out into
      these vehement exclamations: O <hi rend="italic">reproach, O scandall, O gate set open to a
       world of heresies</hi>. He therefore laboureth both by reasons, and by authorities of holy
      Scripture, to make such vsurped power of Laics, a fowle, shameful, and odious practise. In the
      whole, his Lordship toyles himselfe in vaine, &amp; maketh suppositions of castles in the
      aire. For in preferring this Article, the third Estate haue born themselues not as iudges or
      vmpires, but altogether as petitioners: re- questing the said Article might be received into
      the number of the Parliament bookes to bee presented vnto the King and his Counsell, vnto whom
      in all humili- tie they referred the iudgment of the said Article; conceiuing all good hope
      the Clergie and Nobilitie would be pleased to ioyne for the furtherance of their humble
      petition. They were not so ignorant of State-matters, or so vnmindfull of their owne places
      and charges, to beare themselues in hand, that a petition put vp and preferred by the third
      Estate, can carry the force of a Law or Statute, so long as the other two Orders withstand the
      same, and so long as the King himselfe holds backe his Royall consent. Besides, the said
      Article was not propounded as a point of Religious doctrine; but for euer after to remaine and
      continue a funda- mentall Law of the Common-wealth and State it selfe, the due care whereof
      was put into their handes, and committed to their trust. If the King had ratified the said
      Article with Royall consent, and had commanded the Clergie to put in execu- tion the contents
      thereof; it had bene their duetie to see the Kings will and pleasure fulfilled, as they are
      subiects bound to giue him aide in all things, which may any way serue to procure the safetie
      of his life, and the tranquilitie of his Kingdome: Which if the Clergie had performed to the
      vttermost of their power, they had not shewed obedience as vnderlings, vnto the third Estate,
      but vnto the King alone; by whom such command had bene imposed, vpon suggestion of his
      faithfull subiects, made the more watchfull by the negligence of the Clergie; whom they
      perceiue to be lincked with stricter bandes vnto the Pope, then they are vnto their King. Here
      then the Cardinall fights with meere shadowes, and mooues a doubt whereof his aduersaries haue
      not so much as once thought in a dreame: But yet, according to his great dexteritie and
      nimblenesse of spirit, by this deuice he cunningly takes vpon him to giue the King a lesson
      with more <pb n="211"/> libertie; making semblance to direct his masked Oration to the
      Deputies of the people, when hee shooteth in effect, and pricketh at his King, the Princes
      also and Lords of his Counsell, whom the Cardinall compriseth vnder the name of Laics; whose
      iudgment (it is not vnlikely) was apprehended much better by the Clergie, then the iudgement
      of the third Estate. Now these are the men whom he tearmes intruders into other mens charges,
      and such as open a gate for I wot not how many legions of heresies, to rush into the Church:
      For if it be proper to the Clergie and their Head, to iudge in this cause of the Right of
      Kings; then the King himselfe, his Princes, and Nobilitie, are debarred and wiped of all
      iudgement in the same cause, no lesse then the representatiue body of the people. </p><p>Well then, the L. Cardinall<note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag. 61.</note> showres downe
      like haile sundry places and testimonies of Scripture, where the people are commanded to haue
      their Pastors in singular loue, and to beare them all respects of due obseruance. Be it so;
      yet are the said passages of Scripture no barre to the people, for their vigilant circum-
      spection, to preserue the life and Crowne of their Prince, against all the wicked enterprises
      of men stirred vp by the Clergie, who haue their Head out of the King- dome, and hold
      themselues to be none of the Kings subiects: a thing neuer spoken by the sacrificing Priests
      and Prelates, mentioned in the passages alleadged by the Lord Cardinal. He likewise produceth
      two Christian Emperours,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag. 68. </note>
      <hi rend="italic">Constantine</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Valentinian</hi> by name; the first
      refusing to meddle with iudgement in Episcopall causes: the other forbearing to iudge of
      subtile Questions in Diuinity, with protestation, that <hi rend="italic">Hee would neuer bee
       so curious, to diue into the streames, or sound the bottome of so deepe matters</hi>. But who
      doth not know, that working and prouid- ing for the Kings indemnitie and safetie, is neither
      Episcopall cause, nor matter of curious and subtile inquisition ? The same answere meets with
      all the rest of the places produced by the L. Cardinal out of the Fathers. And that one for
      example, out of <hi rend="italic">Gregory Nazianzenus</hi>,<note anchored="true" place="foot"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Orat. ad ciues timore perculsos</foreign>. </note> is not cited by
      the Cardinall with faire dealing. For <hi rend="italic">Gregory</hi> doeth not boord the
      Emperour himselfe, but his Deputy or L. President, on this maner: <hi rend="italic">For we
       also are in authoritie and place of a Ruler, we haue command aswell as your selfe</hi>:<note anchored="true" place="foot"><foreign xml:lang="greek">a)/rxomen ga\r kai\ au)toi\</foreign></note> wheras the L. Cardinal with foule play, turnes the place in these termes, <hi rend="italic">We also are Emperours</hi>. Which words can beare no such inter- pretation, as
      well because he to whom the Bishop then spake, was not of Imperiall dignitie; as also because
      if the Bishop himselfe, a Bishop of so small a citie as <hi rend="italic">Nazianzum</hi>, had
      qualified himselfe Emperour, hee should haue passed all the bounds of modestie, and had shewed
      himselfe arrogant aboue measure. For as touching subiection due to Christian Emperours, hee
      freely acknowledgeth a little before, <hi rend="italic">that himselfe and his people are
       subiect vnto the superiour powers,<note anchored="true" place="foot"><foreign xml:lang="greek">u(potelei=s fo/rou</foreign>.</note> yea bound to pay them tribute</hi>.
      The historie of the same <hi rend="italic">Gregories</hi> life doeth testifie, that he was
      drawen by the <hi rend="italic">Arrians</hi> before the Consuls iudgement seate, and from
      thence returned acquitted, without either stripes or any other kinde of con- <pb n="212"/>
      tumelious entreatie and vse: yet now at last vp starts a Prelate, who dares make this good
      Father vaunt himselfe to be an Emperour. It is willingly granted, that Emperours neuer
      challenged, neuer arrogated, to bee Soueraigne Iudges in con- trouersies of doctrine and
      faith; neuerthelesse it is clearer then the Sunnes light at high noone, that for moderation at
      Synods, for determinations and orders established in Councils, and for the discipline of the
      Church, they haue made a good and a full vse of their Imperiall authoritie. The first
       Council<note anchored="true" place="foot">Vide Canones Graecos a Tilio editos. </note> held
      at <hi rend="italic">Con- stantinople</hi>, beares this title or inscription; <hi rend="italic">The dedication of the holy Synode to the most religious Emperour</hi>
      Theodosius <hi rend="italic">the Great, to whose will and pleasure they haue submitted these
       Canons by them addressed and established in Councill</hi>. And there they also beseech the
      Emperour, to confirme and approue the said Canons. The like hath bene done by the Council of
       <hi rend="italic">Trullo</hi>, by whom the Canons of the fift and sixt Councils were put
      foorth and published. This was not done, because Em- perours tooke vpon them to bee infallible
      Iudges of doctrine; but onely that Emperours might see and iudge, whether Bishops (who feele
      the pricke of am- bition as other men doe) did propound nothing in their Conuocations and Con-
      sultations, but most of all in their Determinations, to vndermine the Emperours authoritie, to
      disturbe the tranquilitie of the Common-wealth, and to crosse the determinations of precedent
      Councils. Now to take the cognizance of such matters out of the Kings hand or power; what is
      it but euen to transforme the King into a standing Image, to wring and wrest him out of all
      care of himselfe and his Kingly Charge, yea to bring him downe to this basest condition, to
      be- come onely an executioner, and (which I scorne to speake) the vnhappy hangman of the
      Clergies will, without any further cognizance, not so much as of matters which most neerely
      touch himselfe, and his Royall estate ? </p><p>I grant it is for Diuinitie Scholes, to iudge how farre the power of the Keyes doth stretch:
      I grant againe, that Clerics both may, and ought also to display the colours and ensignes of
      their censures against Princes, who violating their publike and solemne oath, doe raise and
      make open warre against Iesus <hi rend="italic">Christ:</hi> I grant yet againe, that in this
      case they need not admit Laics to be of their coun- sell, nor allow them any scope or libertie
      of iudgement. Yet all this makes no barre to Clerics, for extending the power of their keyes,
      many times a whole degree further then they ought; and when they are pleased, to make vse of
      their said power, to depriue the people of their goods, or the Prince of his Crowne: all this
      doeth not hinder Prince or people from taking care for the preseruation of their owne rights
      and estates, nor from requiring Clerics to shew their cards, and produce their Charts, and to
      make demonstration by Scripture, that such power as they assume and challenge, is giuen them
      from God. For to leaue the Pope absolute Iudge in the same cause, wherein hee is a partie, and
      (which is the strongest rampier and bulwarke, yea the most glorious and eminent point of his
      domination) to arme him with power to vnhorse Kings out of their seates; what <pb n="213"/> is
      it else but euen to draw them into a state of despaire for euer winning the day, or preuailing
      in their honourable and rightful cause ? </p><p>It is moreouer granted, if a King shall command any thing directly contrary to Gods word,
      and tending to the subuerting of the Church; that Clerics in this case ought not onely to
      dispense with subiects for their obedience, but also ex- presly to forbid their obedience: For
      it is alwayes better to obey God then man. Howbeit in all other matters, whereby the glory and
      maiestie of God is not impeached or impaired, it is the duety of Clerics to plie the people
      with wholesome exhortation to constant obedience, and to auert by earnest disswasions the said
      people from tumultuous reuolt and seditious insurrection. This practise vnder the Pagan
      Emperours, was held and followed by the ancient Christians; by whose godly zeale and patience
      in bearing the yoke, the Church in times past grew and flourished in her happy and plentifull
      increase, farre greater then Poperie shall euer purchase and attaine vnto by all her cunning
      deuices and sleights: as namely by degrading of Kings, by interdicting of Kingdoms, by
      apposted murders, and by Diabolicall traines of Gunne-powder-mines. </p><p>The places of Scripture alleadged in order by the Cardinal, in fauour of those that stand
      for the Popes claime of power and authoritie to depose Kings, are cited with no more sincerity
      then the former: <hi rend="italic">They alledge</hi> (these are his words) <hi rend="italic">that</hi> Samuel <hi rend="italic">deposed King</hi> Saul, <hi rend="italic">or declared him
       to bee deposed, because hee had violated the Lawes of the Iewes Religion</hi>: <note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag 66.</note> His Lordship auoucheth elsewere, that <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi> was deposed, because he had sought prophanely to vsurpe the holy
      Priest- hood. Both false and contrary to the tenour of trewth in the sacred history: For <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi> was neuer deposed according to the sense of the word (I meane, <hi rend="italic">depose)</hi> in the present question; to wit, as deposing is taken for
      despoiling the King of his royall dignitie, and reducing the King to the condition of a
      priuate person: But <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi>
      <note anchored="true" place="foot">1. Sam. 23. 20. &amp; 24. 15. &amp; 2. Sam. 2. 5. </note>
      held the title of King, and continued in possession of his Kingdome, euen to his dying day.
      Yea, the Scripture styles him King, euen to the periodicall and last day of his life, by the
      testimony of <hi rend="italic">Dauid</hi> himselfe, who both by Gods promise, and by precedent
      vnction, was then heire apparant as it were to the Crown, in a maner then ready to gird and
      adorne the temples of his head. For if <hi rend="italic">Samuel</hi>, by Gods commandement,
      had then actually remooued <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi> from his Throne, doubt- lesse the whole
      Church of Israel had committed a grosse errour, in taking and honouring <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi> for their King, after such deposition: doubtlesse the Prophet <hi rend="italic">Samuel</hi> himselfe, making knowen the Lords Ordinance vnto the people, would haue enioyned
      them by strict prohibition to call him no longer the King of Israel: Doubtlesse, <hi rend="italic">Dauid</hi> would neuer haue held his hand from the throat of <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi>, for this respect and consideration, because he was the Lords Anointed.<note anchored="true" place="foot">1. Sam. 26. 11.</note> For if <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi> had
      lost his Kingly authority, from that instant when <hi rend="italic">Samuel</hi> gaue him
      knowl- edge of his reiection; then <hi rend="italic">Dauid</hi>, lest otherwise the Body of
      the Kingdome should want a Royall Head, was to beginne his Reigne, and to beare the Royall <pb n="214"/> scepter in the very same instant: which were to charge the holy Scriptures with
      vntrewth, in as much as the sacred historie begins the computation of the yeeres of <hi rend="italic">Dauids</hi> Reigne, from the day of <hi rend="italic">Sauls</hi> death. Trew it
      is, that in the I. Sam. cap. 15. <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi> was denounced by Gods owne
      sentence, a man reiected, and as it were excommunicated out of the Kingdome, that hee should
      not rule and reigne any longer as King ouer Israel; neuerthelesse, the said sentence was not
      put in execution, before the day when God, executing vpon <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi> an
      exemplarie iudge- ment, did strike him with death. From whence it is manifest and cleare, that
      when <hi rend="italic">Dauid</hi> was annointed King by <hi rend="italic">Samuel</hi>, that
      action was onely a promise,<note anchored="true" place="foot">1. Sam. 16. 23.</note> and a
      testimony of the choice, which God had made of <hi rend="italic">Dauid</hi> for succession
      immediately after <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi>; and not a present establishment, inuestment, or
      install- ment of <hi rend="italic">Dauid</hi> in the Kingdome. Wee reade the like in I. King.
      cap. 19. where God commandeth <hi rend="italic">Elias</hi> the Prophet, to annoint <hi rend="italic">Hasael</hi> King of <hi rend="italic">Syria</hi>: For can any man bee so blinde
      and ignorant in the sacred historie, to beleeue the Prophets of Israel established, or sacred
      the Kings of <hi rend="italic">Syria</hi> ? For this cause, when <hi rend="italic">Dauid</hi>
      was actually established in the Kingdome, hee was annointed the second time.<note anchored="true" place="foot">2. Sam. 2. 4.</note>
     </p><p>In the next place he brings in the Popes champions vsing these words; <note anchored="true" place="foot">1. King. 12.</note>
      <hi rend="italic">Rehoboam was deposed by Ahiah the Prophet, from his Royall right ouer the
       tenne Tribes of Israel, because his father Salomon had played the Apostata, in falling from
       the Law of God</hi>. This I say also is more, then the trewth of the sacred history doeth
      afoard: For <hi rend="italic">Ahiah</hi> neuer spake to <hi rend="italic">Rehoboam</hi> (for
      ought we reade,) nor brought vnto him any message from the Lord; As for the passagequoted by
      the L. Cardinal out of 3. <hi rend="italic">Reg</hi>. chap. 11 . it hath not reference to the
      time of <hi rend="italic">Rehoboams</hi> raigne, but rather indeed to Salomons time: nor doeth
      it carry the face of a iudicatorie sentence for the Kings deposing, but rather of a
      Propheticall predic- tion: For how could <hi rend="italic">Rehoboam</hi>, before hee was made
      King, be depriued of the Kingdome ? Last of all, but worst of all; to alleadge this passage
      for an example of a iust sentence in matter of deposing a King, is to approoue the disloyall
      treacherie of a seruant against his master, and the rebellion of <hi rend="italic">Ieroboam</hi> branded in Scripture with a marke of perpetuall infamie for his wickednesse
      and impietie. </p><p>He goes on with an other example of no more trewth;<note anchored="true" place="foot">1.
       King. 19. </note>
      <hi rend="italic">King Achab was deposed by Elias the Prophet, because he imbraced false
       religion, and worshipped false gods.</hi> False too like the former; King <hi rend="italic">Achab</hi> lost his crowne and his life both together. The Scripture, that speaketh not
      according to mans fancie, but according to the trewth, doeth extend and number the yeeres of
       <hi rend="italic">Achabs</hi> raigne, to the time of his death. Predictions of a Kings ruine,
      are no sentences of deposition. <hi rend="italic">Elias</hi> neuer gaue the subiects of <hi rend="italic">Achab</hi> absolution from their oath of obedience; neuer gaue them the least
      inckling of any such absolution; neuer set vp, or placed any other King in <hi rend="italic">Achabs</hi> throne. </p><p>That of the L. Cardinall <note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag. 68.</note> a little after,
      is no lesse vntrew: <hi rend="italic">That King Vzziah was driuenfrom the conuersation of the
       people by Azarias the Priest, and thereby the</hi>
      <pb n="215"/>
      <hi rend="italic">administration of his Kingdome was left no longer in his power</hi>. Not so:
      For when God had smitten <hi rend="italic">Vzziah</hi> with leprosie in his forehead, he
      withdrew himselfe,<note anchored="true" place="foot">2. Chro. 26. </note> or went out into an
      house apart, for feare of infecting such as were whole by his con- tagious disease. The high
      Priest smote him not with any sentence of deposition, or denounced him suspended from the
      administration of his Kingdome. No: the dayes of his raigne are numbred in Scripture, to the
      day of his death. And whereas the Priest, according to the Law in the 13. of <hi rend="italic">Leuit</hi>. iudged the King to be vncleane; he gaue sentence against him, not as against a
      criminal person, and thereby within the compasse of deposition; but as against a diseased
      body: For the Law inflicteth punishments, not vpon diseases, but vpon crimes. Hereupon,
      whereas it is recorded by Iosephus <note anchored="true" place="foot">Antiq. 1. 9. cap.
       11.</note> in his Antiquities, that <hi rend="italic">Vzziah</hi> led a priuate, and in a
      maner, a solitarie life; the said author doeth not meane, that <hi rend="italic">Vzziah</hi>
      was deposed, but onely that he disburdened himselfe of care to mannage the publique affaires. </p><p>The example of <hi rend="italic">Mattathias</hi>,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag.
       69.</note> by whom the Iewes were stirred vp to rebel against <hi rend="italic">Antiochus</hi>, is no better worth: For in that example we finde no sentence of deposition,
      but onely an heartning and commotion of a people then grieuously afflicted and oppressed. He
      that makes himselfe the ringleader of conspiracie against a King, doeth not foorthwith assume
      the person, or take vp the office and charge of a Iudge, in forme of Law, and iuridically to
      depriue a King of his Regall rights, and Royall prerogatiues. <hi rend="italic">Mattathias</hi> was chiefe of that conspiracie, not in qualitie of Priest, but of
      cheiftaine, or leader in warre and a man the best qualified of all the people. Things acted by
      the suddaine violence of the base vulgar, muste not stand for Lawes, nor yet for proofes and
      arguments of ordinarie power, such as the Pope challengeth to himselfe, and appropriateth to
      his triple-Crowne. </p><p>These be our solide answeres: we disclaime the light armour which the L. Cardinall<note anchored="true" place="foot">Page 67.</note> is pleased to furnish vs withall, forsooth to
      recreate himselfe, in rebat- ing the points of such weapons, as hee hath vouchsafed to put
      into our hands. Now it wil be worth our labour to beate by his thrusts, fetch from the
      ordinary mission of the New Testament, from leprosie, stones, and locks of wooll: A leach no
      doubt of admirable skill, one that for subiecting the Crownes of Kings vnto the Pope, is able
      to extract arguments out of stones; yea, out of the leprosie, and the drie scab, onely
      forsooth because heresie is a kind of leprosie, and an heretike hath some affinitie with a
      leper. But may not his <hi rend="italic">Quoniam</hi>, bee as fitly applyed to any contagious
      and inueterate vice of the minde beside heresie ? His warning- piece <note anchored="true" place="foot">Page 66.</note> therefore is discharged to purpose, whereby hee notifies that
      hee pretendeth to handle nothing with resolution: For indeed vpon so weake arguments, a
      resolution is but ill-fauouredly and weakely grounded. </p><p>His bulwarkes thus beaten downe, let vs now view the strength of our owne. First, he makes
      vs to fortifie on this maner: <hi rend="italic">They that are for the negatiue, doe</hi>
      <pb n="216"/>
      <hi rend="italic">alleadge the authoritie of</hi> S. Paul; <hi rend="italic">Let euery soule
       bee subiect vnto the higher powers: For whosoeuer resisteth the power, resisteth the
       ordinance of God. And likewise that of</hi> S. Peter; <hi rend="italic">Submit your selues,
       whether it be vnto the King, as vnto the superiour, or vnto gouernours, &amp;c. Vpon these
       passages, and the like, they in ferre, that the obedience is due to Kings by the Law of God,
       and not dispensable by any Spirituall or Temporall authoritie.</hi><note anchored="true" place="foot">Page 69.</note> Thus he brings vs in with our first weapon. But here the very
      chiefe sinew and strength of our argument, hee doeth wittingly balked and of purpose conceale:
      To wit; That all the Emperors of whom the said holy Apostles haue made any mention in their
      diuine Epistles, were professed enemies to CHRIST, Pagans, Infidels, fearefull and bloody
      Tyrants: to whom notwithstand- ing <hi rend="italic">euery soule</hi>, and therefore the
      Bishop of Rome for one, is commanded to sub- mit himselfe, and to professe subiection. Thus
      much <hi rend="italic">Chrysostome</hi> hath expresly taught in his Hom. 23. vpon the Epistle
      to the Romanes; <hi rend="italic">The Apostle giues this commandement vnto all: euen to
       Priests also, and cloistered Monkes not onely to Secular: be thou an Apostle, an Euangelist,
       a Prophet, &amp;.c</hi>. Besides, it is here worthy to be noted, that howsoeuer the Apostles
      rule is generall, and therefore bindeth all the faithfull in equall bands; yet is it
      particularly, directly, and of purpose addressed to the Church of Rome by S. <hi rend="italic">Paul</hi>, as by one who in the spirit of an Apostle did foresee, that rebellion against
      Princes was to rise and spring from the citie of Rome. Now in case the Head of that Church by
      warrant of any priuiledge, contained in the most holy Register of Gods holy word, is exempted
      from the binding power of this generall precept or rule; did it not become his Lord- ship to
      shew by the booke, that it is a booke case, and to lay it foorth before that honourable
      assembly, who no doubt expected and waited to heare when it might fall from his learned lips ?
      But in stead of any such authenticall and canonicall confirmation, he flieth to a sleight
      shift, and with a cauill is bold to affirme the foundation, laid by those of our side, doeth
      no way touch the knot of the con- trouersie. Let vs heare him speake: <hi rend="italic">It is
       not in controuersie, whether obedience be due to kings by Gods Law, so long as they are
       kings, or acknowledged for Kings, but our point controuerted, is whether by Gods Law it be
       required, that hee who hath bene once recognised and receiuedfor King by the body of Estates,
       can at any time be taken and reputed as no King, that is to say can doe no maner of acte
       whereby hee may loose his right, and so cease to be saluted King</hi>. This answere of the L.
      Cardinall is the rare deuise, euasion, and starting hole of the <hi rend="italic">Iesuites</hi>: In whose eares of delicate and tender touch, King-killing soundeth very
      harsh; but forsooth to vn-king a King first, and then to giue him the stab, that is a point of
      iust and trew descant: For to kill a King, once vnking'd by deposition, is not killing of a
      King: For the present, I haue one of that Iesuiticall Order in prison, who hath face enough to
      speake this language of Ashdod, and to maintaine this doctrine of the <hi rend="italic">Iesuites</hi> Colledges. The L. Cardinall harpes vpon the same string; He can like
      subiection and obedience to the King, whilest he sitteth King: but his Holinesse must haue <pb n="217"/> all power, and giue order withall, to hoyst him out of his Royall Seat. I therefore
      now answer, that in very deed the former passages of S. <hi rend="italic">Paul</hi> and S. <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> should come nothing neere the question, if the state of the question
      were such as he brings it, made and forged in his owne shop. But certes the states of the
      ques- tion is not, whether a King may doe some acte, by reason whereof hee may fall from his
      right, or may not any longer be acknowledged for King: For all our contention is, concerning
      the Popes power to vn-authorize Princes; whereas in the question framed and fitted by the L.
      Cardinal, not a word of the Pope. For were it granted and agreed on both sides, that a King by
      election might fal from his Kingdom, yet stil the knot of the question would hold, whether he
      can be dis- possessed of his Regal authoritie, by any power in the Pope, &amp; whether the
      Pope hath such fulnes of power, to strip a King of those Royall robes, rights, and reuenewes
      of the Crowne, which were neuer giuen him by the Pope; as also by what authoritie of holy
      Scripture, the Pope is able to beare out himselfe in this power, and to make it good. </p><p>But here the L. Card.<note anchored="true" place="foot">Page 71.</note> stoutly saith in his
      owne defence by way of reioinder; <hi rend="italic">As one text hath, Let euery soule be
       subiect vnto the higher powers; in like manner an other text hath, Obey your Prelates, and be
       subiect vnto your Pastors: for they watch ouer your soules, as men that shall giue an accompt
       for your soules</hi>. This reason is void of reason, and makes against himselfe: For may not
      Prelates be obeyed and honoured, without Kings be deposed ? If Prelates preach the doc- trine
      of the Gospell, will they in the pulpit stirre vp subiects to rebell against Kings ? Moreouer,
      whereas the vniuersall Church in these daies is diuided into so many discrepant parts, that
      now Prelates neither doe nor can draw all one way; is it not exceeding hard, keeping our
      obedience towards God, to honour them all at once with due obedience ? Nay; is not here
      offered vnto me a dart out of the L. Cardinals armorie, to cast at himselfe ? For as God
      chargeth all men with obedience to Kings, and yet from that commaundement of God, the L.
      Cardinall would not haue it inferred, that Kings haue power to degrade Ecclesiasticall
      Prelates: euen so God giueth charge to obey Prelates, yet doeth it not follow from hence, that
      Prelates haue power to depose Kings. These two degrees of obedience agree well together, and
      are each of them bounded with peculiar and proper limits. </p><p>But for so much as in this point, we haue on our side the whole auncient Church, which,
      albeit she liued and groned for many aages together vnder heathen Emperours, heretikes, and
      persecuters, did neuer so much as whisper a word about rebelling and falling from their
      Soueraigne Lords, and was neuer by any mortall creature freed from the oath of allegiance to
      the Emperour; the Cardinall is not vnwilling to graunt, that ancient Christians in those times
      were bound to performe such fidelity and allegiance, for as much as the Church (the Cardinall
      for shame durst not say the Pope) then had not absolued them of their oath. <pb n="218"/> No
      doubt a pleasant dreame, or a merry conceit rather, to imagine the Bishop of Rome was armed
      with power to take away the Empire of the world from <hi rend="italic">Nero</hi>, or <hi rend="italic">Claudius</hi>, or <hi rend="italic">Domitianus</hi>; to whom it was not knowen,
      whether the citie of Rome had any Bishop at all. Is it not a master-iest, of a straine most
      ridiculous, to pre- suppose the Grand-masters and absolute Lords of the whole world, had a
      sent so dull, that the were not able to smell out, and to nose things vnder their owne noses ?
      that they saw so little with other mens eies and their owne, that within their capitall citie,
      they could not spie that Soueraigne armed with ordinary and lawfull authority to degrade, and
      to turne them out of their renowned Empire ? Doubtlesse the said Emperours, vassals belike of
      the Popes Empire, are to be held excused for not acknowledging and honouring the Pope in
      quality of their Lord, as became his vassals; because they did not know there was any such
      power in the world, as aftertimes haue magnified and adored vnder the qualitie of Pope: For
      the Bishops of Rome in those times, were of no greater authoritie, power, and means, then some
      of the Bishops are in these daies within my Kingdomes. </p><p>But certes those Popes of that primitiue aage, thought it not expedient in the said times to
      draw their swords: they exercised their power in a more mild and soft kind of carriage toward
      those miserable Emperours, for three seuerall reasons alledged by the L. Cardinall. </p><p>The first: because the Bishops then durst not by their censures whet and prouoke those
      Emperours, for feare of plunging the Church in a Sea of persecu- tions. But if I be not cleane
      voide of common sense, this reason serueth to charge not onely the Bishops of Rome, but all
      the auncient professors of Christ besides, with deepe dissimulation and hypocrisie: For it is
      all one as if he had professed, that all their obedience to their Soueraignes, was but
      counterfeit, and extorted, or wrong out of them by force; that all the submissiue
      supplications of the auncient Fathers, the assured testimonies and pledges of their
      allegiance, humili- tie, and patience, were but certaine formes of disguised speech,
      proceeding not freely from the suggestions of fidelity, but faintly and fainedly, or at least
      from the strong twitches and violent conuulsions of feare. Whereupon it followes, that all
      their torments and punishments, euen to the death, are wrongfully hon- oured with the title,
      and crowned with the crowne of Martyrdome; because their patience proceeded not from their
      owne free choice and election, but was taught by the force of necessitie, as by compulsion:
      and whereas they had not mu- tinously and rebelliously risen in armes, to asswage the
      scorching heat and burn- ing flames of tyrannicall persecuters, it was not for want of will,
      but for lacke of power. Which false and forged imputation, the Fathers haue cleared themselues
      of in their writings. <hi rend="italic">Tertullian</hi><note anchored="true" place="foot">Tert. Apol. cap. 37. Hesterni sumus &amp; omnia vestra impleuimus. </note> in his Apologet:
       <hi rend="italic">All places are full of Christians, the cities, isles, castles, burroughs,
       armies, &amp;c. If we that are so infinite a power, and multitude of men, had broken from you
       into some remote nooke or corner of the world, the cities no doubt had become naked and
       solitarie: there had beene a dreadfull and</hi>
      <pb n="219"/>
      <hi rend="italic">horrible silence ouer the face of the whole Empire: the great Emperours had
       beene driuen to seeke out new cities, and to discouer newe nations, ouer whom to beare
       Soueragine sway and rule; there had remained more enemies to the State, then subiects and
       friends</hi>. Cyprian<note anchored="true" place="foot">Cypr. cont. Demetr. </note> also
      against Demetrianus: <hi rend="italic">None of vs all howsoeuer we are a people mighty and
       without number, haue made resistance against any of your vniust and wrongfull actions,
       executed with all violence; neither haue sought by rebel- lious armes, or by any other
       sinister practices, to crie quittance with you at any time for the righting of our
       selues</hi>. Certaine it is, that vnder <hi rend="italic">Iulianus</hi>, the whole Em- pire
      in a manner professed the Christian Religion; yea, that his Leiftenants and great Commanders,
      as <hi rend="italic">Iouinianus</hi>, and <hi rend="italic">Valentinianus</hi> by name,
      professed Christ: Which two Princes not long after attained to the Imperiall dignitie, but
      might haue solicited the Pope sooner to degrade <hi rend="italic">Iulianus</hi> from the
      Imperiall Throne. For say that <hi rend="italic">Iulians</hi> whole army had renounced the
      Christian Religion: (as the L. Cardinall against all shew and appearance of trewth would beare
      vs in hand, and contrary to the generall voice of the said whole army, making this profession
      with one consent when <hi rend="italic">Iulian</hi> was dead, <hi rend="italic">Wee are all
       Christians</hi>:) yet <hi rend="italic">Italie</hi> then persisting in the faith of Christ,
      and the army of <hi rend="italic">Iulian</hi> then lying quartered in <hi rend="italic">Persia</hi>, the vtmost limit of the Empire to the East,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Socr. lib. 3. cap. 19. Theod, lib. 4. cap. 1. Sozom. lib. 6. cap. 1.</note> the Bishop of
       <hi rend="italic">Rome</hi> had fit opportunitie to draw the sword of his authoritie (if hee
      had then any such sword hanging at his Pontificall side) to make <hi rend="italic">Iulian</hi>
      feele the sharpe edge of his weapon, and thereby to pull him downe from the stately pearch of
      the Romane Empire. I say moreouer, that by this generall and sudden profession of the whole
       <hi rend="italic">Caesarian</hi> armie, <hi rend="italic">Wee are all Christians</hi>, it is
      clearly testified, that if his armie or souldiers were then addicted to Paganisme, it was
      wrought by compulsion, and cleane con- trary to their setled perswasion before: and then it
      followes, that with greater patience they would haue borne the deposing of <hi rend="italic">Iulian</hi>, then if hee had suffered them to vse the libertie of their conscience. To bee
      short in the matter; S. <hi rend="italic">Augus- tine</hi>
      <note anchored="true" place="foot">August. in Psal. 124.</note> makes all whole, and by his
      testimony doeth euince, that <hi rend="italic">Iulians</hi> armie per- seuered in the faith of
      Christ. <hi rend="italic">The souldiers of Christ serued a Heathen Emperour: But when the
       cause of Christ was called in question, they acknowledged none but Christ in heauen: When the
       Emperour would haue them to serue, and to perfume his idols with frankincense, they gaue
       obedience to God, rather then to the Emperour</hi>. After which words, the very same words
      alleadged by the L. Cardinall <note anchored="true" place="foot">Page 82.</note> against
      himselfe doe follow; <hi rend="italic">They did then distinguish betweene the Lord Eternal,
       and the Lord temporall: neuerthelesse, they were subiect vnto the Lord temporall, for the
       Lord Eternall</hi>. It was therefore to pay God his duetie of obedience, and not for feare to
      incense the Emperour, or to draw persecution vpon the Church (as the L. Cardinal would made vs
      beleeue) that Christians of the Primitiue Church, and Bishops by their censures, durst not
      anger and prouoke their Emperours. But his Lordship by his coloured pretences doeth manifestly
      prouoke and stirre vp the <pb n="220"/> people to rebellion, so soone as they know their own
      strength to beare out a re- bellious practise: Whereupon it followes, that in case their
      conspiracie shall take no good effect, all the blame and fault must lie, not in their
      disloyalty and treason, but in the bad choice of their times for the best aduantage, and in
      the want of taking a trew sight of their owne weakenesse. Let stirring spirits be trained vp
      in such practicall precepts, let desperate wits be seasoned with such rules of dis- cipline;
      and what need we, or how can wee wonder they contriue Powder-con- spiracies, and practise the
      damnable art of parricides ? </p><p>After <hi rend="italic">Iulian</hi>, his Lordship falles vpon <hi rend="italic">Valentinian</hi> the younger, who maintain- ing Arrianisme with great and open violence,
      might haue bene deposed by the Christians from his Empire, and yet (say wee) they neuer
      dream'd of any such practise. Heere the L. Cardinall<note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag.
       82.</note> maketh answere: <hi rend="italic">The Christians mooued with respect vnto the
       fresh memory both of the brother and father, as also vnto the weake estate of the sonnes
       young yeeres, abstained from all counsels and courses of sharper effect and operation</hi>.
      To which answere I replie: these are but friuolous coniec- tures, deuised and framed to ticle
      his owne fancie: For <hi rend="italic">had Valentinianus</hi> the younger beene the sonne of
      an <hi rend="italic">Arrian</hi>, and had then also attained to threescore yeeres of aage,
      they would neuer haue borne themselues in other fashion then they did, towards their Emperour.
      Then the Cardinall goeth on: The people would not abandon the factious and seditious party,
      but were so firme or obstinate rather for the faction, that <hi rend="italic">Valentinian</hi>
      for feare of the tumultuous vproares was constrained to giue way, and was threatened by the
      souldiers, that except hee would adhere vnto the Catholikes, they would yeeld him no
      assistance, nor stand for his partie. Now this answere of the L. Cardinall makes nothing to
      the purpose, concerning the Popes power to pull downe Kings from their stately nest. Let vs
      take notice of his proper consequence. <hi rend="italic">Valentinian</hi> was afraid of the
      popu- lar tumult at <hi rend="italic">Milan</hi>; the Pope therefore hath power to curbe
      Hereticall Kings by deposition. Now marke what distance is betweene <hi rend="italic">Rome</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Milan</hi>, what dif- ference betweene the people of <hi rend="italic">Milan</hi>, and the Bishop of <hi rend="italic">Rome</hi>; betweene a popular
      tumult, and a iudicatorie sentence; betweene fact and right, things done by the people or
      souldiers of <hi rend="italic">Milan</hi>, and things to be done according to right and law by
      the Bishop of <hi rend="italic">Rome</hi>; the same distance, the same difference (if not
      farre greater) is betweene the L. Cardinals antecedent and his consequent, betweene his
      reason, and the maine cause or argument which we haue in hand. The mad commotion of the people
      was not heere so much to bee regarded, as the sad in- struction of the Pastour, of their good
      and godly Pastour S. <hi rend="italic">Ambrose</hi>, so farre from hartening the people of <hi rend="italic">Milan</hi> to rebel, that being Bishop of <hi rend="italic">Milan</hi>, he
      offered himself to suffer Martydome: <hi rend="italic">If the Emperour abuse his Imperiall
       authority</hi>, (for so <hi rend="italic">Theodoret</hi> hath recited his words) <hi rend="italic">to tyrannize thereby, heere am I ready to suffer death</hi>. And what
      resistance he made against his L. Emperor, was onely by way of supplication in these termes;
       <hi rend="italic">Wee beseech thee</hi>, 0 Augustus, <hi rend="italic">as humble
       suppliants;</hi>
      <pb n="221"/>
      <hi rend="italic">we offer no resistance: we are not infeare, but weflie to supplication</hi>.
      Againe, <hi rend="italic">If my patrimony be your marke, enter vpon my patrimony if my body I
       wil goe and meet my torments. Shall I be drag'd to prison or to death ? I will take delight
       in both. Item,</hi> in his Oration to <hi rend="italic">Auxentius; I can afflict my soule
       with sorrow, I can lament, I can send forth grieuous groans: My weapons against either of
       both, souldiers or Goths, are teares: A Priest hath none other weapons of defence: I neither
       can resist, nor ought in any other maner to make resistance.</hi><note anchored="true" place="foot">Epist. lib. 5. Epist. 33. Epist. lib. 5.</note>
     </p><p><hi rend="italic">Iustinian</hi> the Emperour in his old aage fell into the heresie of the
       <hi rend="italic">Aphtharto- docites</hi>. Against <hi rend="italic">Iustinian</hi>, though
      few they were that fauoured him in that heresie, the Bishop of <hi rend="italic">Rome</hi>
      neuer darted with violence any sentence of excom- munication, interdiction, or deposition. </p><p>The <hi rend="italic">Ostrogot</hi> Kings in <hi rend="italic">Italie</hi>, the <hi rend="italic">Visigot</hi> in <hi rend="italic">Spaine</hi>, the <hi rend="italic">Vandal</hi> in <hi rend="italic">Africa</hi> were all addicted to the <hi rend="italic">Arrian</hi> impietie, and some of them cruelly persecuted the trew professours. The <hi rend="italic">Visigot</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Vandall</hi> were no neighbours to <hi rend="italic">Italie</hi>. The Pope thereby had the lesse cause to feare the stings of those
      waspes, if they had bene angred. The Pope for all that neuer had the humour to wrestle or
      iustle with any of the said Kings in the cause of deposing them from their Thrones. But espe-
      cially the times when the <hi rend="italic">Vandals</hi> in <hi rend="italic">Affricke</hi>,
      and the <hi rend="italic">Goths</hi> in <hi rend="italic">Italie</hi> by <hi rend="italic">Belisarius</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Narses</hi>, professours of the Orthodoxe Faith, were
      tyred with long warres, and at last were vtterly defeated in bloody battels, are to bee
      considered. Then were the times or neuer, for the Pope to vnsheath his weapons, and to vncase
      his ar- rowes of deposition; then were the times to draw them out of his quiuer, and to shoot
      at all such <hi rend="italic">Arrian</hi> heads; then were the times by dispensations to
      release their subiects of their oathes, by that peremptorie meanes to aide and strengthen the
      Catholique cause: But in that aage the said weapons were not knowne to haue bene hammered in
      the Pontificall forge. <hi rend="italic">Gregorie</hi> the I. made his boasts, that he was
      able to ruine the Lombards, (for many yeeres together sworne enemies to the Bishops of Rome)
      their state present, and the hope of all their future prosperitie. But he telleth vs, that by
      the feare of God before his eyes and in his heart, he was bridled and restrained from any such
      intent; as elsewhere we haue obserued:<note anchored="true" place="foot">In Apol. pro iuram.
       fidel. His owne words lib. 7. Epist. 1.</note>
      <hi rend="italic">If I would haue medled with practis- ing and procuring the death of the
       Lombards, the whole nation of the Lombards at this day had bene robbed of their Kings, Dukes,
       Earles, they had bene reduced to the tearmes of extreame confusion</hi>. He might at least
      haue deposed their King, (if the credit of the L. Cardinals iudgement be currant) without
      polluting or stayning his owne conscience. </p><p>What can we tearme this assertion of the L. Cardinal, but open charging the most ancient
      Bishops of Rome with crueltie, when they would not succour the Church of CHRIST oppressed by
      tyrants, whose oppression they had power to represse by deposing the oppressors. Is it
      credible, that IESVS CHRIST hath giuen <pb n="222"/> a Commission to S. <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> and his successors for so many aages, without any power to execute their
      Commission, or to make any vse thereof by practise ? Is it credible, that hee hath giuen them
      a sword to bee kept in the scabbard, without drawing once in a thousand yeeres ? Is it
      credible, that in the times when Popes were most deboshed, abandoning themselues to all sorts
      of corrupt and vitious courses, as is testified by their owne flatterers and best affected
      seruants; it is credible that in those times they began to vnderstand the vertue &amp;
      strength of their Commission ? For if either feare or lacke of power, was the cause of holding
      their hands, and voluntarie binding of themselues to the Peace or good behauiour: wherefore is
      not some one Pope at least produced, who hath complained that he was hindered from executing
      the power that CHRIST had conferred vpon his Pontificall See ? Wherefore is not some one of
      the ancient and holy Fathers alledged, by whom the Pope hath bene aduised and exhorted to take
      courage, to stand vpon the vigor and sinewes of his Papall Office, to vnsheath and vncase his
      bolts of thunder against vngodly Princes, and grieuous enemies to the Church ? wherefore
      liuing vnder Christian and gracious Emperours, haue they not made knowne the reasons, why they
      were hindred from drawing the pretended sword; lest long custome of not vsing the sword so
      many aages, might make it so to rust in the scabbard, that when there should be occasion to
      vse the said sword, it could not be drawne at all; and lest so long custome of not vsing the
      same, should confirme prescription to their greater preiudice ? If weakenesse be a iust let,
      how is it come to passe, that Popes haue enterprised to depose <hi rend="italic">Philip the
       Faire, Lewis</hi> the XII, and ELIZABETH my predecessor of happy memorie; (to let passe
      others) in whom experience hath well proued, how great inequalitie was betweene their
      strengths ? Yea, for the most part from thence grow most grieuous troubles and warres, which
      iustly recoile and light vpon his owne head; as happened to <hi rend="italic">Gregorie</hi>
      the VII. and <hi rend="italic">Boniface</hi> the VIII. This no doubt is the reason, wherefore
      the Pope neuer sets in (for feare of such inconueniences) to blast a King with lightning and
      thunder of deposition, but when hee perceiues the troubled waters of the Kingdome by some
      strong faction setled in his Estate; or when the King is confined and bordered by some Prince
      more potent, who thirsteth after the prey, and is euer gaping for some occasion to picke a
      quarrell. The King standing in such estate, is it not as easie for the Pope to pull him downe,
      as it is for a man with one hand to thrust downe a tottering wall, when the groundsill is
      rotten, the studdes vnpind and nodding or bending towards the ground ? But if the King shall
      beare downe and breake the faction within the Realme; if hee shall get withall the vpper hand
      of his enemies out of the Kingdome; then the holy Father presents him with pardons neuer sued
      for, neuer asked; and in a fathers indul- gence forsooth, giues him leaue still to hold the
      Kingdome, that hee was not able by all his force to wrest and wring out of his hand, no more
      then the club of <hi rend="italic">Her- cules</hi> out of his fist. How many worthy Princes,
      incensed by the Pope, to conspire against Soueraigne Lords their Masters, and by open
      rebellion to worke some <pb n="223"/> change in their Estates, haue miscarried in the action,
      with losse of life, or honour, or both ? For example; <hi rend="italic">Rodulphus</hi> Duke of
       <hi rend="italic">Sueuia</hi> was eg'd on by the Pope, against <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi>
      IIII. of that name Emperour. How many massacres, how many desolations of Cities and townes,
      how many bloody battels ensued thereupon ? Let histories bee searched, let iust accompts be
      taken, and besides sieges layde to Cities, it will appeare by trew computation, that <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi> the IIII. and <hi rend="italic">Frederic</hi> the first, fought
      aboue threescore battels, in defence of their owne right against enemies of the Empire,
      stirred vp to armes by the Pope of Rome. How much Christian blood was then spilt in these
      bloody battels, it passeth mans wit, penne, or tongue to expresse. And to giue a little touch
      vnto matters at home; doeth not his Holinesse vnderstand right well the weakenesse of Papists
      in my Kingdome ? Doeth not his Holinesse neuerthelesse animate my Papists to rebellion, and
      forbid my Papists to take the Oath of Allegiance ? Doeth not his Holinesse by this meanes draw
      (so much as in him lyeth) persecution vpon the backes of my Papists as vpon rebels, and expose
      their life as it were vpon the open stall, to be sold at a very easie price ? All these
      examples, either ioynt or seuerall, are manifest and euident proofes, that feare to draw
      mischiefe and persecution vpon the Church, hath not barred the Popes from thundering against
      Emperours and Kings, when- soeuer they conceiued any hope, by their fulminations to aduance
      their greatnesse. </p><p>Last of all; I referred the matter to the most possessed with preiudice, euen the very
      aduersaries, whether this doctrine, by which people are trained vp in subiection vnto Infidel
      or hereticall Kings, vntill the subiects be of sufficient strength to mate their Kings, to
      expell their Kings, and to depose them from their Kingdomes, doth not incense the Turkish
      Emperours and other Infidell Princes to roote outall the Christians that drawe in their yoke,
      as people that waite onely for a fit occasion to rebell, and to take themselues ingaged for
      obedience to their Lords, onely by constraint and seruile feare. Let vs therefore now conclude
      with <hi rend="italic">Ozius</hi>,<note anchored="true" place="foot"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Apud Athan. in Epist. ad solitar. vitam agentes</foreign>.</note> in that famous Epistle
      speaking to <hi rend="italic">Constantius</hi> an Arrian heretike: <hi rend="italic">As hee
       that by secret practise or open violence would bereaue thee of thy Empire, should violate
       Gods ordinance: so bee thou touched with feare, least, by vsurping authoritie ouer Church
       matters, thou tumble not headlong into some hainous crime</hi>. Where this holy Bishop hath
      not vouchsafed to insert and mention the L. Cardinals excep- tion; to wit, the right of the
      Church alwaies excepted and saued, when she shall be of sufficient strength to shake off the
      yoke of Emperours. Neither speaks the same holy Bishop of priuate persons alone, or men of
      some particular condition and calling; but hee setteth downe a generall rule for all degrees,
      neuer to impeach imperial Maiesties upon any pretext whatsoever. </p><p>As his Lordships first reason drawne from weakenesse is exceeding weake: so is thatwhich the
      L. Cardinall<note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag. 77.</note> takes vp in the next place: <hi rend="italic">He tellethvs there is very great difference betweene Pagan Emperours, and
       Christian Princes: Pagan Emperours who neuer did homage to Christ, who neuer were by their
       subiects receiued, with condition</hi>
      <pb n="224"/>
      <hi rend="italic">to acknowledge perpetuall subiection vnto the Empire of Christ; who neuer
       were bound by oath and mutuall contract between Prince and subiect. Christian Princes who
       slide backe by Apostasie, degenerate by Arrianisme, or fall away by Mahometisme.</hi>
      Touching the latter of these two, (as his Lordshippe saith) <hi rend="italic">If they shall as
       it were take an oath, and make a vowe contrary to their first oath and vow made and taken
       when they were installed, and contrary to the condition vnder which they receiued the Scepter
       of their Fathers; if they withall shall turne persecutors of the Catholike re- ligion</hi>;
      touching these I say, the L. Cardinal holds, that without question they may bee remooued from
      their Kingdomes: He telleth vs not by whom, but euery where he meaneth by the Pope. Touching
      Kings deposed by the Pope vnder pretence of stupidity, as <hi rend="italic">Childeric</hi>; or
      of matrimoniall causes, as <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> I. or for collating of benefices, as
       <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the Faire; not one word: By that point he easily glideth, and
      shuffles it vp in silence, for feare of distasting the Pope on the one side, or his auditors
      on the other. </p><p>Now in alledging this reason, his Lordship makes all the world a witnes, that in deposing of
      Kings, the Pope hath no eye of regard to the benefit and securitie of the Church: For such
      Princes as neuer suckt other milke then that of Infidelitie and persecution of Religion, are
      no lesse noisome and pernicious vermin to the Church, then if they had sucked of the Churches
      breasts. And as for the great- nesse of the sinne or offence, it seemes to me there is very
      little difference in the matter. For a Prince that neuer did sweare any religious obedience to
      IESUS <hi rend="italic">Christ</hi>, is bound no lesse to such obedience, then if he had taken
      a solemne oath: As the sonne that rebelliously stands vp against his father, is in equall
      degree of sinne, whether he hath sworne or not sworne obedience to his father; because he is
      bound to such obedience, not by any voluntarie contract or couenant, but by the law of Nature.
      The commaundement of God to kisse the Sonne, whom the Father hath confirmed and ratified King
      of Kings, doeth equally bind all Kings, as well Pagans as Christians. On the other side, who
      denies, who doubts, that <hi rend="italic">Constantius</hi> Emperour at his first steppe or
      entrance into the Empire, did not sweare and bind himselfe by solemne vowe, to keepe the rules
      and to maintaine the precepts of the Orthodox faith, or that he did not receiue his fathers
      Empire vpon such condition? This notwithstanding, the Bishop of <hi rend="italic">Rome</hi>
      pulled not <hi rend="italic">Constantius</hi> from his Imperiall throne, but <hi rend="italic">Constantius</hi> remooued the Bishop of <hi rend="italic">Rome</hi> from his Papall See. And
      were it so, that an oath taken by a King at his consecration, and after violated, is a
      sufficient cause for the Pope to depose an Apostate or hereticall Prince; then by good
      consequence the Pope may in like sort depose a King, who beeing neither dead in Apostasie, nor
      sicke of Heresie, doeth neglect onely the due administration of iustice to his loyall
      subiects: For his oath taken at consecration importeth likewise, that he shall minister
      iustice to his people. A point wherein the holy Father is held short by the L. Cardinall, who
      dares prescribe new lawes to the Pope, and presumes to limit <hi rend="italic">his fulnesse of
       power</hi>, within certaine meeres and head-lands, extending the Popes power only <pb n="225"/> to the deposing of Christian Kings, when they turne Apostats forsaking the Catholike faith;
      and not such Princes as neuer breathed any thing but pure Paganisme, and neuer serued vnder
      the colours of Iesus Christ. Meanewhile his Lordship forgets, that King <hi rend="italic">Attabaliba</hi> was deposed by the Pope from his King- dome of <hi rend="italic">Peru</hi>,
      and the said Kingdome was conferred vpon the King of <hi rend="italic">Spaine,</hi> though the
      said King of <hi rend="italic">Peru</hi> never forsook his heathen superstition; and though
      the turning of him out of his terrestriall Kingdome was no way to conuert him vnto the faith
      of Christ. Yea his Lordship <note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag. 77.</note> a little after
      telleth vs himselfe, that <hi rend="italic">Be the Turkes possession in the conquests that he
       maketh ouer Christians neuer so auncient, yet by no long tract of time whatsoeuer, can he
       gaine so much as a thumbes breadth of prescription</hi>: that is to say, the Turke for all
      that is but a disseisor, one that violently and wilfully keeps an other man from his owne, and
      by good right may be dispossessed of the same: whereas notwithstanding the Turkish Em- perours
      neuer fauoured nor sauoured Christianitie. Let vs runne ouer the ex- amples of Kings whom the
      Pope hath dared and presumed to depose; and hardly will any one be found, of whom it may be
      trewly auouched, that he hath taken an oath contrary to his oath of subiection to Iesus <hi rend="italic">Christ</hi>, or that he hath wilfully cast himselfe into Apostaticall
      defection. </p><p>And certes to any man that weighs the matter with due consideration, it wil be found
      apparently false, that Kings of <hi rend="italic">France</hi> haue bene receiued of their sub-
      iects at any time, with condition to serue IESVS CHRIST. They were actually Kings before they
      came forth to the solemnitie of their sacring, before they vsed any stipulation or promise to
      their subiects. For in hereditary kingdoms, (nothing more certaine, nothing more
      vncontrouleable) the Kings death in- stantly maketh liuery and seisin of the Royaltie, to his
      next successour. Nor is it materiall to replie, that a King succeeding by right of
      inheritance, takes an oath in the person of his predecessor. For euery oath is personall,
      proper to the person by whom it is taken: and to God no liuing creature can sweare, that his
      owne sonne or his heire shall proue an honest man. Well may the father, and with great
      solemnitie, promise that he will exhort his heire apparant with all his power and the best of
      his endeauours, to feare God and to practise piety. If the fathers oath be agreeable to the
      dueties of godlinesse, the sonne is bound thereby, whether he take an oath, or take none. On
      the other side, if the fathers oath come from the puddles of impietie, the sonne is bound
      thereby to goe the contrary way. If the fathers oath concerne things of indifferent nature,
      and such as by the variety or change of times, become either pernicious or impossible; then it
      is free for the Kings next successor and heire, prudently to fit and proportion his Lawes vnto
      the times present, and to the best benefit of the Common-wealth. </p><p>When I call these things to mind with some attention, I am out of all doubt, his Lordship is
      very much to seeke, in the right sense and nature of his Kings oath taken at his Coronation,
      to defend the Church, and to perseuere in the <pb n="226"/> Catholike faith: For what is more
      vnlike and lesse credible then this conceit, that after <hi rend="italic">Clouis</hi> had
      reigned 15. yeeres in the state of Paganisme, and then receiued holy Baptisme, he should
      become Christian vpon this condition, That in case hee should afterward reuolt from the Faith,
      it should then bee in the power of the Church, to turne him out of his Kingdome ? But had any
      such conditionall stipulation beene made by <hi rend="italic">Clouis</hi>, in very good
      earnest and trewth; yet would hee neuer haue intended, that his deposing should bee the acte
      of the Romane Bishop, but rather of those (whether Peeres or people, or whole body of the
      State) by whom he had bene aduanced to the Kingdome. Let vs heare the trewth, and this is the
      trewth: It is farre from the customary vse in <hi rend="italic">France</hi>, for their Kings
      to take any such oath, or to vse any such stipulation with their subiects. If any King or
      Prince wheresoeuer, doth vse an oath or solemne promise in these ex- presse termes, <hi rend="italic">Let me lose my Kingdome, or my life, be that day my last both for life and
       reigne, when I shall first reuolt from the Christian Religion</hi>: By these words he calleth
      vpon God for vengeance, hee vseth imprecation against his owne head: but hee makes not his
      Crowne to stoupe by this meanes to any power in the Pope, or in the Church, or in the people. </p><p>And touching inscriptions vpon coynes, of which point his Lordship speaketh by the way;
      verely the nature of the money or coine (the stamping and minting whereof is one of the marks
      of the Prince his dignity and Soueraignty) is not changed by bearing the letters of Christ
      Name on the reuerse or on the front. Such characters of Christs Name, are aduertisements and
      instructions to the people, that in shewing and yeelding obedience vnto the King, they are
      obedient vnto the King, they are obedient vnto Christ; &amp; those Princes likewise, who are
      so wel aduised, to haue the most sacred Names inscribed and printed in their coines, doe take
      and acknowledge Iesus <hi rend="italic">Christ</hi> for supreme King of Kings. The said holy
      characters are no representation or profession, that any Kings Crowne dependeth vpon the
      Church, or can be taken away by the Pope. The L. Cardinal indeed so beareth vs in hand. But he
      inuerts the words of Iesus <hi rend="italic">Christ</hi>, and wrings them out of the right
      ioynt: For Christ without all ambiguitie and circum- locution, by the image and inscription of
      the money, doeth directly and expressely prooue <hi rend="italic">Caesar</hi> to bee free from
      subiection, and entirely Soueraigne. Now if such a supreme and Soueraigne Prince, at any time
      shall bandie and combine against God, and thereby shall become a rebellious and perfidious
      Prince; doubtless for such disloyaltie he shall deserue, that God would take from him all hope
      of life eternall: and yet hereby neither Pope nor people hath reason to bee puft vp, in their
      power to depriue him of his temporall Kingdome. </p><p>The L. Cardinall <note anchored="true" place="foot">Page 76.</note> saith besides; <hi rend="italic">The champions of the Popes power to depose Kings, doe expound that commandement
       of</hi> S. Paul, <hi rend="italic">whereby euery soule is made sub- iect vnto the superiour
       powers, to bee a prouisionall precept or caution accommodated to the times; and to stand in
       force, onely vntill the Church were growen in strength vn-</hi>
      <pb n="227"/>
      <hi rend="italic">to such a scantling, that it might be in the power of the faithfull, without
       shaking the pillars of Christian state, to stand in the breach, and cautelosly to prouide
       that none but Christian Princes might be receiued; according to the Law in Deut. Thou shalt
       make thee a King from among thy brethren</hi>. The reason whereupon they ground, is this: <hi rend="italic">Because</hi> Paul <hi rend="italic">saith, It is a shame for Christians to be
       iudged vnder vniust Infidels, in matters or businesse, which they had one against another:
       For which inconuenience,</hi> Iustinian <hi rend="italic">after prouided by Law; when hee
       ordeined that no Infidel nor Heretike might be admitted to the administration of iustice in
       the Common-wealth.</hi>
     </p><p>In which words of the Cardinall, the word <hi rend="italic">Receiued</hi>, is to bee
      obserued espe- cially and aboue the rest: For by chopping in that word, hee doeth nimbly and
      with a tricke of <hi rend="italic">Legier demain</hi>, transforme or change the very state of
      the ques- tion. For the question or issue of the cause, is not about receiuing, establishing,
      or choosing a Prince; (as in those Nations where the Kingdome goes by election) but about
      doing homage to the Prince, when God hath setled him in the King- dome, and hath cast it vpon
      a Prince by hereditary succession: For that which is written, <hi rend="italic">Thou shalt
       make thee a King</hi>, doeth no way concerne and touch the people of <hi rend="italic">France</hi> in these dayes: because the making of their King hath not of long time been tyed
      to their election. The passage therefore in Deuter. makes nothing to the purpose; no more then
      doth <hi rend="italic">Iustinians</hi> law: For it is our free and voluntary confession, that
      a Christian Prince is to haue speciall care of the Lawes, and to prouide that no vnbeleeuer be
      made Lord Chiefe-Iustice of the Land, that no Infidel be put in trust with administration of
      Iustice to the people. But here the issue doeth not direct vs to speake of Delegates, of
      subordinate Magistrates, and such as are in Commission from the Prince, but of the supreame
      Prince himselfe, the Soueraigne Magistrate ordained by nature, and confirmed by succession.
      Our question is, whether such a Prince can be vnthroned by the Pope, by whom he was not placed
      in the Throne; and whether the Pope can despoile such a Prince, of that Royaltie which was
      neuer giuen him by the Pope, vnder any pretended colour and imputation of heresie, of
      stupiditie, or infringing the priuiledges of Monaste- ries, or transgressing the Lawes and
      lines of holy Matrimonie. </p><p>Now that S. <hi rend="italic">Pauls</hi> commandement which bindeth euery soule in the bands
      of subiection vnto the higher powers, is no precept giuen by way of <hi rend="italic">prouiso</hi>, and onely to serue the times, but a standing and a perpetuall rule, it is
      hereby more than manifest. S. <hi rend="italic">Paul</hi> hath grounded this commandement vpon
      certaine rea- sons, not onely constant and permanent by their proper nature, but likewise
      necessary for euery state, condition, and reuolution of the times. His reasons; <hi rend="italic">Because all powers are ordained of God: because resisting of powers is
       resisting the ordinance of God: because the Magistrate beares the sword to execute iustice:
       because obedience and subiection to the Magistrate is necessary, not onely for feare of his
       wrath, or feare of punishment, but also for conscience sake</hi>. It is therefore a case
      grounded vpon conscience, it is not a Law deuised by humane wisedome; it is not fashionable to
      the qualities of the times. Apostolicall instructions for the right <pb n="228"/> informing of
      maners, are not changeable according to times and seasons. To vse the L. Cardinals language,
      and to follow his fancie in the matter, is to make way for two pestiferous mischiefes: First,
      let it be free and lawfull for Christians, to hold the commanding rules of GOD for
      prouisionall cautions, and what followes ? Men are ledde into the broad way of impietie, and
      the whole Scripture is wiped of all authoritie. Then againe, for the other mischiefe: The
      glorious triumphes of most blessed Martyrs in their vnspeakable torments and sufferings, by
      the L. Car- dinals position shall bee iudged vnworthy to weare the title and Crowne of Mar-
      tyrdome. How so ? Because (according to his new fiction) they haue giuen place to the violence
      and furie of heathen Magistrates, not in obedience to the necessary and certaine Commandement
      of God, but rather to a prouisionall direction, ac- commodated to the humours of the times.
      And therfore the L. Cardinal hath vsed none other clay wherewith to dawbe ouer his deuise, but
      plaine falsification of holy Scripture: For he makes the Apostle say to the Corinthians, <hi rend="italic">It is a shame for Christians to bee iudged vnder vnbeleeuing Magistrates</hi>;
      whereas in that whole context of Paul, there is no such matter. For when the Apostle saith,
       <hi rend="italic">I speake it euen to your shame</hi>; <note anchored="true" place="foot"><foreign xml:lang="greek">pro\s e)ntroph\n de/gw</foreign>.</note> he doeth not say it is a
      shame for a beleeuer to be iudged vnder an Infidel, but he makes them ashamed of their vngodly
      course, and vn- christian practise, that in suing and impleading one another, they layd their
      actions of contention in the Courts of vnbeleeuing Iudges. The shame was not in bearing that
      yoke which God had charged their necks withall, but in deuouring and eating vp one an other
      with Writs of <hi rend="italic">habeas corpus</hi>, and with other Processes; as also in
      vncouering the shame, in laying open the shamefull parts and prankes played by Christians,
      before Infidels, to the great scandall of the Church. Here I say the L. Cardinall is taken in
      a tricke of manifest falsification. If therefore a King when he falls to play the heretike,
      deserueth to be deposed; why should not a Cardinall when he falls to play the iuggler with
      holy Scripture, deserue to be disrobed ? </p><p>Meane while the indifferent Reader is to consider, how greatly this doctrine is preiudicial,
      and how full of danger, to Christians liuing vnder hereticall or Pagan Princes. For make it
      once knowne to the Emperour of Turkes, let him once get neuer so little a smacke of this
      doctrine; that Christians liuing vnder his Empire doe take Gods commandement, for obedience to
      Princes whom they count In- fidels, to be onely a prouisional precept for a time, and wait
      euery houre for all occasions to shake off the yoke of his bondage; doubtlesse he will neuer
      spare with all speed to roote the whole stocke, with all the armes and branches of Christians
      out of his dominions. Adde hereunto the L. Cardinals former determination; that possession
      kept neuer so long by the Turke in his Conquests ouer Christians, gaines him not by so long
      tract of time one inch of prescription; and it will appear, that his Lordship puts the Turkish
      Emperour in minde, and by his in- struction leades the said Emperour as it were by the hand,
      to haue no maner of <pb n="229"/> affiance in his Christian subiects; and withall to afflict
      his poore Christians with all sorts of most grieuous and cruell torments. In this regard the
      poore Christians of Grecia and Syria, must needs be very little beholden to his Lordship. As
      for my selfe, and my Popish Subiects, to whom 1 am no lesse then an heretike for- sooth am not
      I by this doctrine of the Cardinall, pricked and whetted against my naturall inclination, to
      turne clemencie into rigour; seeing that by his doctrine my subiects are made to beleeue, they
      owe me subiection onely by way of <hi rend="italic">prouiso,</hi> and with waiting the
      occasion to worke my vtter destruction and finall ruine; the rather, because Turkes,
      miscreants, and heretikes are marshalled by the Cardinall in the same ranke; and heretikes are
      counted worse, yea more iustly deposeable, then Turkes and Infidels, as irreligious breakers
      and violaters of their oath ? Who seeth not here how great indignitie is offered to me a
      Christian King, paral- leled with Infidels, reputed worse then a Turke, taken for an vsurper
      of my King- domes, reckoned a Prince, to whom subiects owe a forced obedience by way of
      prouision, vntill they shall haue meanes to shake off the yoke, and to bare my temples of the
      Crowne, which neuer can be pulled from the sacred Head, but with losse of the head it selfe ? </p><p>Touching the warres vndertaken by the <hi rend="italic">French, English</hi>, and <hi rend="italic">Germaines</hi>, in their expedition for Ierusalem, it appeares by the issue and
      euent of the said warres, that God approoued them not for honourable. That expedition was a
      deuise and inuention of the Pope, whereby he might come to be infeoffed in the Kingdomes of
      Christian Princes.. For then all such of the <hi rend="italic">French, English</hi>, or <hi rend="italic">Germaines</hi>, as vndertooke the Croisade, became the Popes meere vassals.
      Then all robbers by the high way side, adulterers, cutthroats, and base bankerupts, were
      exempted from the Secular and Ciuill power, their causes were sped in Con- sistorian Courts,
      so soone as they had gotten the Crosse on their cassocks or coat- armours, and had vowed to
      serue in the expedition for the Leuant. Then for the Popes pleasure and at his commaundement,
      whole countryes were emptied of their Nobles and common souldiers. Then they made long marches
      into the Leuant: For what purpose ? Onely to die vpon the points of the <hi rend="italic">Saracens</hi> pikes, or by the edge of their barbarous courtelasses, battle-axes, fauchions,
      and other weapons, without any benefit and aduantage to themselues or others. Then the Nobles
      were driuen to sell their goodly Mannors, and auncient demaines to the Church-men, at vnder
      prises and low rates; the very roote from which a great part of the Church and Church-mens
      reuenewes hath sprung and growne to so great height. Then, to be short, his most bountifull
      Holiness <note anchored="true" place="foot">See the Bull of Innoc. 3. at the end of the
       Latter. Conc.</note> gaue to any of the riffe-raffe-rank, that would vndertake this
      expedition into the Holy land, a free and full pardon for all his sinnes, besides a degree of
      glory aboue the vulgar in the Celestial Paradise. Military vertue, I confesse, is commendable
      and honourable; prouided it bee employed for iustice, and that generous noblenesse of valiant
      spirits bee not vnder a colour and shadow of piety, fetcht ouer with some casts or deuises of
      Italian cunning. <pb n="230"/>
     </p><p>Now let vs obserue the wisedome of the Lord Cardinall through this whole discourse. His
      Lordship is pleased in his Oration, to cite certaine few passages of Scripture, culls and
      picks them out for the most gracefull in shewe: leues out of his whole troupes of honourable
      witnesses, vpon whose testimonie, the Popes themselues and their principall adherents doe
      build his power to depose Kings, and to giue order for all Temporall causes. Take a sight of
      their best and most honourable witnesses. <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> said to Christ, <hi rend="italic">See here two swords</hi>; and Christ answered, <hi rend="italic">It is
       sufficient</hi>. Christ said to <hi rend="italic">Peter, Put vp thy sword into thy
       sheath.</hi> God said to Ieremie,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Ier. 1.</note>
      <hi rend="italic">I haue established thee ouer Nations and Kingdomes. Paul</hi><note anchored="true" place="foot">1. Cor. 21.</note> said to the Corinthians, <hi rend="italic">The spirituall man discerneth all things</hi>. Christ said to his Apostles, <hi rend="italic">Whatsoeuer yee shall loose vpon earth</hi>: by which words the Pope hath power
      forsooth to loose the oath of allegiance. <hi rend="italic">Moses</hi> said, <hi rend="italic">In the beginning God created the heauen and the earth</hi>. Vpon these passages, Pope <hi rend="italic">Boniface</hi> 8. grapling and tugging with <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the
      Faire, doth build his Temporall power.<note anchored="true" place="foot"><foreign xml:lang="lat">Extrauag. Vnam Sanctam</foreign>.</note> Other Popes and Papists auouch the
      like authorities. Christ said of himself, <hi rend="italic">All things are giuen to me of my
       Father, and all power is giuen vnto me in heauen and in earth</hi>. The Deuils said, <hi rend="italic">If thou cast vs out, send vs into this herd of swine</hi>. Christ said to his
      Disciples, <hi rend="italic">Yee shall finde the colt of an asse bound, loose it and bring it
       vnto me</hi>. By these places the aduersaries prooue, that Christ disposed of Temporall
      matters; and inferre thereupon, why not Christs Vicar as well as Christ himselfe. The places
      and testimonies now following are very expresse: <hi rend="italic">In stead of thy fathers
       shall be thy children: thou shalt make them Princes through all the earth</hi>.<note anchored="true" place="foot">Psal. 45.</note> Item, Iesus Christ not onely commaunded <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> to <hi rend="italic">feed his lambs</hi>; but said also to <hi rend="italic">Peter, Arise, kill, and eat</hi>:<note anchored="true" place="foot">Ioh. 12
       [21].</note> the pleasant glosse, the rare inuention of the L. Cardinall <hi rend="italic">Baronius</hi>. Christ said to the people, <hi rend="italic">If I were lift vpfrom the earth,
       I will draw all things vnto me</hi>. Who lets, what hinders this place from fitting the Pope
      ? <hi rend="italic">Paul</hi> said to the Corinthians, <hi rend="italic">Know ye not that we
       shall iudge the Angels ? how much more then the things that pertaine vnto this life</hi> ? A
      little after, <hi rend="italic">Haue not we power to eate</hi> ? These are the chiefe
      passages, on which as vpon maine arches, the roofe of Papall Monarchie, concerning Temporall
      causes, hath rested for three or foure aages past. And yet his Lordship durst not repose any
      confidence in their firme standing to beare vp the said roofe of Temporall Monarchie, for
      feare of making his auditors to burst with laughter. A wise part without question, if his
      Lordship hath not defiled his lips before, with a more ridiculous argument drawne from the
      leprosie and drie scab. </p><p>Let vs now by way of comparison behold Iesus Christ paying tribute vnto <hi rend="italic">Caesar</hi>, and the Pope making <hi rend="italic">Caesar</hi> to pay him tribute: Iesus
      Christ perswading the Iewes to pay tribute vnto an heathen Emperour, and the Pope dispending
      with subiects for their obedience to Christian Emperours: Iesus Christ refusing to arbitrate a
      controuersie of inheritance partable betweene two priuate parties, and the Pope thrusting in
      himselfe without warrant or Commission to bee absolute <pb n="231"/> Iudge in the deposing of
      Kings: Iesus Christ professing that his Kingdome is not of this world, and the Pope
      establishing himselfe in a terrene Empire. In like manner the Apostles forsaking all their
      goods to followe Christ, and the Pope robbing Christians of their goods; the Apostles
      persecuted by Pagan Emperours, and the Pope now setting his foote on the very throate of
      Christian Emperours, then proudly treading Imperiall Crownes vnder his feete. By this
      comparison, the L. Cardinalls allegation of Scripture in fauour of his Master the Pope, is but
      a kind of puppet-play, to make Iesus Christ a mocking stocke, rather then to satisfie his
      auditors with any sound precepts and wholesome instructions. Hereof he seemeth to giue some
      inckling himselfe: For after he hath beene plentifull in citing authorities of Scripture, and
      of newe Doctors, which make for the Popes power to depose Kings; at last he comes in with a
      faire and open confession,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Pag. 85. </note> that neither by
      diuine Oracles, nor by honourable antiquitie, this controuersie hath beene yet determined: and
      so pulls downe in a word with one hand, the frame of worke that he had built and set vp before
      with an other; discouering withall, the reluctation and priuie checkes of his owne conscience. </p><p>There yet remaineth one obiection, the knot whereof the L. Cardinall in a maner sweateth to
      vntie. His words be these:<note anchored="true" place="foot">Page 84.</note>
      <hi rend="italic">The champions for the negatiue flie to the analogie of other proceedings and
       practises in the Church: They affirme that priuate persons, masters or owners of goods and
       possesions among the common people, are not depriued of their goods for Heresie; and
       consequently that Princes much more should not for the same crime bee depriued of their
       estates</hi>. For answere to this reason, he brings in the defendants of deposition, speaking
      after this maner; <hi rend="italic">In the Kingdome of</hi> France <hi rend="italic">the
       strict execution of lawes decreed in Court against Here- tikes, is fauourably suspended and
       stopped, for the preseruation of peace and publike tranquilitie</hi>. He saith elsewhere; <hi rend="italic">Conniuence is vsed towards these Heretikes in regard of their multitude,
       because a notable part of the French Nation and State is made all of Heretikes</hi>. I
      suppose that out of speciall charitie, he would haue those Here- tikes of his owne making,
      forewarned what courteous vse and entreaty they are to expect; when he affirmeth that
      execution of the lawes is but suspended: For indeed suspensions hold but for a time. But in a
      cause of that nature and impor- tance, I dare promise my selfe, that my most honoured brother
      the King of <hi rend="italic">France,</hi> will make vse of other counsell: will rather seeke
      the amitie of his neighbour Princes, and the peace of his Kingdome: will beare in mind the
      great and faithfull seruice of those, who in matter of religion dissent from his Maiestie, as
      of the onely men that haue preserued and saued the Crowne for the King his father, of most
      glorious memorie. I am perswaded my brother of <hi rend="italic">France</hi> wil beleeue, that
      his liege people pretended by the L. Cardinall to bee heretikes, are not halfe so bad as my
      Romane Catholike subiects, who by secret practises vndermine my life, serue a forreine
      Souereigne, are discharged by his Bulls of their obedience due to me their naturall
      Souereigne, are bound (by the maximes and rules published and <pb n="232"/> maintained in
      fauour of the Pope, before this full and famous assemblie of the Estate <hi rend="italic">at
       Paris</hi>; if the said maximes be of any weight and authoritie) to hold meet for no lawfull
      King, are there taught and instructed, that <hi rend="italic">Pauls</hi> commande- ment
      concerning subiection vnto the higher Powers, aduerse to their professed religion, is onely a
      prouisionall precept, framed to the times, and watching for the opportunitie to shake off the
      yoake. All which notwithstanding, I deale with such Romane-Catholikes by the rules and wayes
      of Princely clemencie; their heinous and pernicious error, in effect no lesse then the
      capitall crime of high treason, I vse to call some disease or distemper of the mind. Last of
      all, I beleeue my said brother of <hi rend="italic">France will</hi> set downe in his tables,
      as in record, how little hee standeth ingaged to the L. Cardinall in this behalfe: For those
      of the reformed Religion professe and proclaime, that next vnder God, they owe
      theirpreseruation and safetie to the wisedome and benignity of their Kings. But now comes the
      Cardinall, and he seekes to steale this perswasion out of their hearts: He tells them in open
      Parliament, and without any going about bushes, that all their wel- fare and securitie
      standeth in their multitude, and in the feare which others con- ceiue to trouble the State, by
      the strict execution of lawes against Heretikes. </p><p>He addeth moreouer, that <hi rend="italic">In case a third Sect should peepe out and growe
       vp in</hi> France, <hi rend="italic">the professors thereof should suffer confiscation of
       their goods, with losse of life it selfe; as hath bene practised at</hi> Geneua <hi rend="italic">against</hi> Seruetus, <hi rend="italic">and in</hi> England <hi rend="italic">against</hi> Arians. My answer is this, That punishments for heretikes, duely and according
      to Law conuicted, are set downe by decrees of the ciuill Magistrate, bearing rule in the
      countrey where the said heretikes inhabite, and not by any ordinances of the Pope. I say
      withall, the L. Cardinall hath no reason to match and parallell the reformed Churches with <hi rend="italic">Seruetus</hi> and the <hi rend="italic">Arians</hi>: For those heretikes were
      powerfully conuicted by Gods word, and lawfully condemned by the ancient Generall Councils,
      where they were permitted and admitted to plead their owne cause in person. But as for the
      trewth professed by me, and those of the reformed Religion, it was neuer yet hissed out of the
      Schooles, nor cast out of any Council, (like some Parliament bills) where both sides haue bene
      heard with like indifferencie. Yea, what Council soeuer hath bene offered vnto vs in these
      latter times, it hath bene proposed with certaine presuppositions: as, That his Holinesse
      (beeing a partie in the cause, and consequently to come vnder iudge- ment as it were to the
      barre vpon his triall) shall be the Iudge of Assize with Commission of <hi rend="italic">Oyer</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Determiner</hi>: it shall been celebrated in a citie of no
      safe accesse, without safe conduct or conuoy to come or goe at pleasure, and without danger:
      it shall be assembled of such persons with free suffrage and voyce, as vphold this rule,
      (which they haue already put in practise <hi rend="italic">against Iohn Hus</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Hierome</hi> of <hi rend="italic">Prage</hi>) that faith giuen, and oath taken
      to an Heretike, must not be obserued. </p><p>Now then to resume our former matter; If the Pope hitherto hath neuer pre- sumed, for
      pretended heresie to confiscate by sentence, either the lands or the <pb n="233"/> goods of
      priuate persons, or common people of the French Nation, wherefore should hee dare to
      dispossesse Kings of their Royall thrones ? wherefore takes he more vpon him ouer Kings, then
      ouer priuate persons; wherefore shall the sacred heads of Kings be more churlishly, vnciuilly,
      and rigorously handled, then the hoods of the meanest people ? Here the L. Cardinal in stead
      of a direct answer, breakes out of the lists, alledging cleane from the purpose examples of
      heretikes punished, not by the Pope, but by the ciuill Magistrate of the Countrey: But <hi rend="italic">Bellarmine</hi> speakes to the point with a more free and open heart: hee is
      absolute and resolute in this opinion, that his Holinesse hath plenary power to dispose all
      Temporall estates and matters in the whole world; <hi rend="italic">I am confident</hi> (saith
       <hi rend="italic">Bellar- mine <note anchored="true" place="foot">Contr. Barclaium, cap.
        27.</note>) and I speake it with assurance, that our Lord</hi> Iesus Christ <hi rend="italic">in the dayes of his mortalitie, had power to dispose of all Temporall things
       yea, to strip Souereigne Kings and absolute Lords of their Kingdomes and Seignories: and
       without all doubt hath granted and left euen the same power vnto his Vicar, to make vse
       thereof when- soeuer hee shall thinke it necessary for the saluation of soules</hi>. And so
      his Lordship speaketh without exception of any thing at all: For who doth not know, that <hi rend="italic">lesus Christ</hi> had power to dispose no lesse of priuate mens possessions,
      then of whole Realmes and Kingdomes at his pleasure, if it had beene his pleasure to display
      the ensignes of his power ? The same fulnesse of power is likewise in the Pope. In good time:
      belike his Holinesse is the sole heire of Christ, in whole and in part. The last Lateran
      Council <note anchored="true" place="foot">Sess. 9.</note> fineth a Laic that speaketh
      blasphemie, for the first offence (if he be a gentleman) at 25. ducats, and at 50. for the
      second. It presupposeth and taketh it for graunted, that the Church may rifle and ran- sacke
      the purses of priuate men, and cast lots for their goods. The Councill of <hi rend="italic">Trent</hi> diggeth as deepe for the same veine of gold and siluer. It ordaines; <note anchored="true" place="foot">Sess. 25. cap. 19. </note>
      <hi rend="italic">That Emperours, Kings, Dukes, Princes, and Lords of cities, castles, and
       territories hold- ing of the Church, in case they shall. assigne any place within their
       limits or liberties for the duell betweene two Christians, shall be depriued of the said
       citie, castle, or place, where such duell shall be performed, they holding the said place of
       the Church by any kind of tenure: that all other Estates held in fee where the like offence
       shall be committed, shall forthwith fall and become forfeited to their immediate and next
       Lords: that all goods, possessions, and estates, as well of the combatants themselues, as of
       their seconds shall bee confiscate</hi>. This Councill doeth necessarily presuppose, it lieth
      in the hand and power of the Church, to dispose of all the lands and estates, held in fee
      throughout all Christendome; (because the Church forsooth can take from one, and giue vnto an
      other all estates held in fee whatsoeuer, as well such as hold of the Church, as of secular
      Lords) and to make ordinances for the confisca- tion of all priuate persons goods. By this
      Canon the Kingdome of <hi rend="italic">Naples</hi> hath need to looke well vnto it selfe. For
      one duell it may fall into the Exchecquer of the Romane Church; because that Kingdome payeth a
      Reliefe to the Church, as a Royaltie or Seignorie that holdeth in fee of the said Church. And
      in <hi rend="italic">France</hi>
      <pb n="234"/> there is not one Lordship, not one Mannor, not one farme which the Pope by this
      meanes cannot shift ouer to a new Lord. His Lordship therefore had carried him- selfe and the
      cause much better, if in stead of seeking such idle shifts, he had by a more large assertion
      maintained the Popes power to dispose of priuate mens possessions, with no lesse right and
      authoritie then of Kingdomes: For what colour of reason can bee giuen, for making the Pope
      Lord of the whole, and not of the parts ? for making him Lord of the forrest in grosse, and
      not of the trees in parcell ? for making him Lord of the whole house, and not of the parlour
      or the dining chamber ? </p><p>His Lordship alleadgeth yet an other reason, but of no better weight: <hi rend="italic">Betweene the power of priuate owners ouer their goods, and the power of Kings ouer their
       estates, there is no little difference: For the goods of priuate persons are ordained for
       their owners, and Princes for the benefit of their Common-wealths</hi>. Heare me now answere.
      If this Cardinal-reason hath any force to inferre, that a King may law- fully be depriued of
      his Kingdome for heresie, but a priuate person cannot for the same crime be turned out of his
      mansion house; then it shall follow by the same reason, that a Father for the same cause may
      bee depriued of all power ouer his children, but a priuate owner cannot be depriued of his
      goods in the like case: because goods are ordeined for the benefit and comfort of their
      owners, but fathers are ordeined for the good and benefit of their children: But most certain
      it is, that Kings representing the image of God in earth and Gods place, haue better and
      closer seate in their chaires of Estate, then any priuate persons haue in the saddle of their
      inheritances and patrimonies, which are dayly seene for sleight causes, to flit and to fall
      into the hands of new Lords: Whereas a Prince being the Head, cannot bee loosed in the proper
      ioynt, not dismounted; like a cannon when the carriage thereof is vnlockt, without a sore
      shaking and a most grieuous disloca- tion of all the members, yea, without subuerting the
      whole bodie of the State, whereby priuate persons without number are inwrapped together in the
      same ruine; euen as the lower shrubs and other brush-wood are crushed in pieces alto- gether
      by the fall of a great oake. But suppose his Lordships reason were some- what ponderous and
      solide withall, yet a King (which would not bee forgotten) is endowed not onely with the
      Kingdome, but also with the ancient Desmenes and Crowne-lands, for which none can be so simple
      to say, The King was ordeined and created King; which neuerthelesse he loseth when hee loseth
      his Crowne. Admit againe this reason were of some pith, to make mighty Kings more easily de-
      poseable then priuate persons from their patrimonies; yet all this makes nothing for the
      deriuing and fetching of deposition from the Popes Consistorie. What hee neuer conferred, by
      what right or power can he claime to take away ? </p><p>But see heere no doubt a sharpe and subtile difference put by the L. Cardinall betweene a
      Kingdome, and the goods of priuate persons. <hi rend="italic">Goods</hi>, as his Lordship
      saith, <hi rend="italic">are without life: they can be constrained by no force, by no example,
       by no inducement of their owners to lose eternall life: Subiects by their Princes may</hi>.
      Now <pb n="235"/> I am of the contrary beliefe, That an hereticall owner, or master of a
      family, hath greater power and meanes withall, to seduce his owne seruants and children, then
      a Prince hath to peruert his own subiects; and yet for the contagion of Heresie, and for
      corrupt religion, children are not remoued from their parents, nor seruants are taken away
      from their masters. Histories abound with examples of most flourishing Churches, vnder a
      Prince of contrary religion. And if things without life or soule are with lesse danger left in
      an heretikes hands; why then shall not an hereticall King with more facilitie and lesse danger
      keepe his Crowne, his Royall charge, his lands, his customes, his imposts, &amp;c ? For will
      any man, except he bee out of his wits, affirme these things to haue any life or soule ? Or
      why shall it bee counted folly to leaue a sword in the hand of a mad Bedlam ? Is not a sword
      also without life and soule ? For my part, I should rather be of this minde; that possession
      of things without reason, is more dangerous and pernicious in the hands of an euill master,
      then the possession of things endued with life and reason: For things without life lacke both
      reason and iudgment, how to exempt and free themselues from being instruments in euill and
      wicked actions, from being emploied to vngodly and abominable vses. I will not deny, that an
      hereti- call Prince is a plague, a pernicious and mortall sickenesse to the soules of his
      subiects: But a breach made by one mischiefe, must not bee filled vp with a greater
      inconuenience: An errour must not be shocked and shouldered with disloialtie, not heresie with
      periurie, not impietie with sedition and armed rebel- lion against GOD and the King. GOD, who
      vseth to try and to schoole his Church, will neuer forsake his Church; nor hath need to
      protect his Church by any pro- ditorious and prodigious practises of perfidious Christians:
      For he makes his Church to be like the burning bush: In the middest of the fire and flames of
      per- secutions, hee will prouide that she shall not be consumed, because hee standeth in the
      midst of his Church. And suppose there may be some iust cause for the French, to play the
      rebels against their King; yet will it not follow, that such rebellious motions are to be
      raised by the bellowes of the Romane Bishop, to whose Pastorall charge and office it is
      nothing proper, to intermeddle in the ciuill affaires of forraine Kingdomes. </p><p>Here is the summe and substance of the L. Cardinals whole discourse, touching his pretence
      of the second inconuenience. Which discourse hee hath closed with a remarkeable confession: to
      wit, that neither by the authoritie of holy Scripture, nor by the the testimonie and verdict
      of the Primitiue Church, there hath bene any full decision of this question. In regard whereof
      he falleth into admiration, that Lay-people haue gone so farre in audaciousnesse, as to labour
      that a doubt- full doctrine might for euer passe currant, and be taken for a new article of
      faith. <hi rend="italic">What a shame, what a reproach is this ? how full of scandall</hi> ?
      for so his Lordship is pleased to cry out. <hi rend="italic">This breakes into the seueralls
       and inclosures of the Churche: this lets in whole herds of heresies to grase in her greene
       and sweet pastures</hi>. On the other side, without any such Rhetoricall outcries, I simply
      affirme: It is a re- <pb n="236"/> proach, a scandall, a crime of rebellion, for a subiect
      hauing his full charge and loade of benefits, in the new spring of his Kings tender aage, his
      King-fathers blood yet reeking, and vpon the point of an addresse for a double match with
      Spaine; in so honourable an assembly, to seeke the thraldome of his Kings Crowne, to play the
      captious in cauilling about causes of his Kings deposing, to giue his former life the Lye with
      shame enough in his old aage, and to make him- selfe a common by-word, vnder the name of a <hi rend="italic">Problematicall Martyr</hi>; one that offers himselfe to fagot and fire, for a
      point of doctrine but problematically handled, that is, distrustfully and onely by way of
      doubtfull and questionable dis- course: yea for a point of doctrine, in which the French (as
      he pretendeth) are permitted to thwart and crosse his Holines in iudgement, prouided they
      speake in it as in a point, not certaine and necessary, but onely doubtfull and probable. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>